<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clash of the Titans: SEO vs Social Media – Who’s Going to be Left</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shoemoney.com/2009/12/22/clash-of-the-titans-seo-vs-social-media-%e2%80%93-who%e2%80%99s-going-to-be-left/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2009/12/22/clash-of-the-titans-seo-vs-social-media-%e2%80%93-who%e2%80%99s-going-to-be-left/</link>
	<description>Skills to Pay the Bills</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2009/12/22/clash-of-the-titans-seo-vs-social-media-%e2%80%93-who%e2%80%99s-going-to-be-left/#comment-144370</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoemoney.com/?p=6231#comment-144370</guid>
		<description>I think the death of SEO is probably a good thing. So many searches seem to have become irrelevant due to craftfully written website copy.  I think using social media to rank websites will result in more accurate searches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the death of SEO is probably a good thing. So many searches seem to have become irrelevant due to craftfully written website copy.  I think using social media to rank websites will result in more accurate searches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sionne</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2009/12/22/clash-of-the-titans-seo-vs-social-media-%e2%80%93-who%e2%80%99s-going-to-be-left/#comment-144202</link>
		<dc:creator>Sionne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoemoney.com/?p=6231#comment-144202</guid>
		<description>Tim, re: &quot;It’s not the strongest that survive...&quot; I said (almost) exactly the same thing back on December 23rd. Great minds think alike, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, re: &#8220;It’s not the strongest that survive&#8230;&#8221; I said (almost) exactly the same thing back on December 23rd. Great minds think alike, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim @ internet marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2009/12/22/clash-of-the-titans-seo-vs-social-media-%e2%80%93-who%e2%80%99s-going-to-be-left/#comment-144161</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim @ internet marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 07:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoemoney.com/?p=6231#comment-144161</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not the strongest that survive, it&#039;s the ones that are most responsive to change. Doing the same old thing won&#039;t work forever, we have to stay up to date with all the changes going on at Google etc if we are to get good positions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not the strongest that survive, it&#8217;s the ones that are most responsive to change. Doing the same old thing won&#8217;t work forever, we have to stay up to date with all the changes going on at Google etc if we are to get good positions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2009/12/22/clash-of-the-titans-seo-vs-social-media-%e2%80%93-who%e2%80%99s-going-to-be-left/#comment-144035</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoemoney.com/?p=6231#comment-144035</guid>
		<description>for one thing Facebook may have 350 million users , but Google has about 10 times that number . Also , Google&#039;s attempts at adding Tweets to SERPS have been pretty useless and irrelevant . Looks as if they haven&#039;t applied their algorithm to the Tweets</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for one thing Facebook may have 350 million users , but Google has about 10 times that number . Also , Google&#8217;s attempts at adding Tweets to SERPS have been pretty useless and irrelevant . Looks as if they haven&#8217;t applied their algorithm to the Tweets</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ships</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2009/12/22/clash-of-the-titans-seo-vs-social-media-%e2%80%93-who%e2%80%99s-going-to-be-left/#comment-143989</link>
		<dc:creator>Ships</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 16:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoemoney.com/?p=6231#comment-143989</guid>
		<description>The thing I want to add to this, is that SEO is turning into social media optimization (SMO). it can bring high traffic to you also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing I want to add to this, is that SEO is turning into social media optimization (SMO). it can bring high traffic to you also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Ziering - A Phoenix SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2009/12/22/clash-of-the-titans-seo-vs-social-media-%e2%80%93-who%e2%80%99s-going-to-be-left/#comment-143941</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Ziering - A Phoenix SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 16:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoemoney.com/?p=6231#comment-143941</guid>
		<description>The reality is that unless they have a human ranking every single result page, there will be a market for SEO. Algorithms are inherently vulnerable, and will be &quot;exploited&quot;. Even if they have a human ranking the sites, there will still be SEO, it will just be called bribes.

Josh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reality is that unless they have a human ranking every single result page, there will be a market for SEO. Algorithms are inherently vulnerable, and will be &#8220;exploited&#8221;. Even if they have a human ranking the sites, there will still be SEO, it will just be called bribes.</p>
<p>Josh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2009/12/22/clash-of-the-titans-seo-vs-social-media-%e2%80%93-who%e2%80%99s-going-to-be-left/#comment-143939</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 15:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoemoney.com/?p=6231#comment-143939</guid>
		<description>I hope SEO doesn&#039;t change to much a lot of peoples online businesses depend on it to support there families etc... If it does we will have to be like Chameleons and change with our surroundings.

I hope SEO isn&#039;t changed to drastically in the coming years. I guess everyone has to be prepared for change if it does. After all the world and the Internet are changing daily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope SEO doesn&#8217;t change to much a lot of peoples online businesses depend on it to support there families etc&#8230; If it does we will have to be like Chameleons and change with our surroundings.</p>
<p>I hope SEO isn&#8217;t changed to drastically in the coming years. I guess everyone has to be prepared for change if it does. After all the world and the Internet are changing daily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

