Would Firefox Exist Without Google Funding?

by Jeremy Schoemaker on August 29, 2008 · 89 comments

A while back I suggested Yahoo could gain instant market share simply by outbidding Google to be the default browser. I immediately got a response from Mozilla lead developer Asa Dotzler saying:

Donations or other financial contributions and arrangements have nothing to do with why Google is the default search service in Firefox. Google is the default service (and was long before there was any money associated with it) in Firefox because our users tell us it’s the service they want.

Or to put it another way, Yahoo couldn’t buy the default slot in Firefox. No one could. Not even Google.

What Yahoo could do, something Google does, is to distribute a version of Firefox with Yahoo defaults. Mozilla has a broad partners program that allows for this and Yahoo could help Firefox and at the same time help themselves by participating.

But that developer even if he is a lead developer must be out of the loop. Danny Sullivan emailed me and pointed me to this article which indeed confirms that the deal between Google and Mozilla was to set Google as the default search engine and homepage for Firefox.

Yesterday Techcrunch reported Google has outbid all other search engines to ensure they remain the default search engine and homepage for Firefox users for at least the next 3 years. The total amount comes to about $180 Million Dollars for 3 years and will account for at least 85% of Mozilla’s funding.

I have to say I am very happy Google is funding Firefox. It is an awesome browser and with out the $57+ Million per year from Google their is no way it would be anything close to what it is today. (Go capitalism!)

About the author...

– who has written 2414 posts on ShoeMoney.com.

Hi I am Jeremy Schoemaker and ShoeMoney.com is my blog. 99% of the post here are done by me but you will see others occasionally make guest posts. This blog is fun to write but for my day job I run several online companies.

Images provided by ShutterStock


Mark recommends you read these posts also:

  1. s 9 Reasons Why Your Online Business Will Fail
  2. reject-stamp 10 Tips for Freelance Writers Applying for Blogging Jobs
  3. obama3-1 Obama’s whitehouse.gov Squeeze Pages

{ 86 comments… read them below or add one }

1 esooomllub August 29, 2008 at 9:21 am

If that is what it takes for them to offer a viable solution to IE, I have no problem with it. I’ve changed the default home page on browsers the day I install them forever.

Reply

2 Online Dividends August 31, 2008 at 1:14 pm

So i guess if I have a semi-good search engine as google, but if I get over $185 million to Mozilla to have my site as the default search engine I will get a great market share overnight?
But then IE comes out with MSN website by default, and yet people are still using google to search rather than Live..

Reply

3 Myrtle Beach Rentals September 1, 2008 at 5:42 pm

I’m the same way, I change the default browser day 1. I don’t like MSN

Reply

4 Loren Baker August 29, 2008 at 9:24 am

If Mozilla only served Google Search as a default engine because they liked it and it has nothing to do with money or bidding, then why the hell do they serve Yahoo Search in Japan and Asia? Why? Because the money was better : http://tinyurl.com/5ejs39

I too am glad Google is funding Firefox … but I’m sure M$ is not :)

Reply

5 Brent August 29, 2008 at 9:26 am

“Go capitalism!”

Do this mean that you now support McCain instead of Obama? :D

Reply

6 Jeremy Schoemaker August 29, 2008 at 9:33 am

Its going to be a tough choice for me for sure.

Reply

7 cheap used cars August 29, 2008 at 11:46 am

anyone who makes a lot of money, chances are they are a republican, or at least vote that way. besides, would you make an intern the CEO of your company? no matter how promising that intern was???

Reply

8 LetUsReviewIt August 29, 2008 at 9:12 pm

Looks like the old washed up CEO who doesnt know what is going on in the world just hired someone as his number 2 who isn’t even intern level yet just because of her looks. God bless america

Reply

9 Dick August 30, 2008 at 7:42 am

This comment is called “a step without any policy”. -)))

Reply

10 Myrtle Beach Rentals September 1, 2008 at 5:43 pm

you are right, this November is going to be tough. Honestly I don’t like either one

Reply

11 GeorgeSorry August 29, 2008 at 9:44 am

Thank God, somebody is helping Firefox. I can’t run IE without it crashing on me every 5 minutes. If not for Firefox browing would be much more difficult.

Reply

12 cheap used cars August 29, 2008 at 11:47 am

ever heard of opera?

http://www.opera.com

Reply

13 Gossip September 1, 2008 at 1:24 pm

Opera is not so popular comparing with FF & IE.

Reply

14 Le Melon August 29, 2008 at 1:49 pm

Best browsers:
K-Meleon
Firefox (my fav)
Opera

special mentions:
offby1 (lightweight)
IE6 (if it displayed pages correctly)

Reply

15 coops August 29, 2008 at 10:03 am

McCain just commited suicide if it is indeed the alaskan governor. Thanks for taking away the only scare tactic you had with the experience gig. Geesh let’s face it McCain is 72 making his VP choice all the more important.

Reply

16 Mubin August 29, 2008 at 10:12 am

Thank God GOogle was willing to pay for the default spot. I am not sure if firefox would be as widely accepted as it is without the default search engine being GooGle. Plus at least this keeps GooGle out of the browser wars… for now.

Reply

17 Jagat August 29, 2008 at 10:16 am

Indeed Google makes the world go around!! And Mozilla can count on the moolah and the blessings!!

Reply

18 Jewellery August 29, 2008 at 6:38 pm

They aren’t counting on the blessing, they’re counting on the fact that they’ve got a good product and Google are prepared to be the homepage for its web browsers ;)

Reply

19 stevewrightaz August 29, 2008 at 10:21 am

Thank god for Google, thank god for firefox. btw, does anyone else think firefox 3 is a bit slower than the last? I’m not sure if its just me or what.

Reply

20 Le Melon August 29, 2008 at 3:52 pm

I feel it’s faster, but it doesn’t deal with live bookmarks/feeds well for me.
It tries to update all of them at the same time and even with just 10, FF3 becomes unusable for about a minute while it updates them all. :-(
Anyone else with a similar problem?

Reply

21 Bulbboy August 29, 2008 at 10:35 am

It’s just a better browsing experience, with very few crashes. Does that make me a firefoxtard?

Reply

22 Bryan August 29, 2008 at 10:43 am

I think they’d still exist but the market share wouldn’t be close and there definitely wouldn’t be as many kick A plugins.

Reply

23 Nimic August 29, 2008 at 10:43 am

I don’t know what I’d do without Firefox. Certainly, I wouldn’t be running IE…

Reply

24 web hosting rebates August 29, 2008 at 11:04 am

there’s always opera or safari…both of them are pretty good and way better than IE.

Reply

25 Jewellery August 29, 2008 at 6:38 pm

There are many other browsers out there including the ones web hosting rebates has mentioned.

Reply

26 wesley August 29, 2008 at 10:46 am

Opera seems to exist without google. Is there a mobile version of firefox?

Reply

27 web hosting rebates August 29, 2008 at 1:33 pm

is not ready for user testing yet…The name of the mobile version is Fennec

Reply

28 esooomllub August 29, 2008 at 3:36 pm

it exists… but has no market share to speak of. Maybe if Firefox was not around it might, but as I recall it was a marginal browser (marketwise), long before Firefox came around.

Reply

29 web hosting rebates August 29, 2008 at 11:04 am

google is leading the internet world, no doubt about that

Reply

30 cheap used cars August 29, 2008 at 11:44 am

it may have been the ‘users choice’ before funding, but ever since they disclosed the search revenue they get from having google up there it was obvious they would never change.

Reply

31 MarketingWicked August 29, 2008 at 11:48 am

I’m glad google is funding Firefox, and even more glad yahoo is not… just about anything they touch seems to crumble lately, let’s not take down a good browser with it

Reply

32 Tom August 29, 2008 at 12:22 pm

Maybe Cuil has a few spare change to fund Netscape?

Reply

33 Jewellery August 29, 2008 at 6:40 pm

Cuil won’t invest in these browsers until it fixes its results. A Yahoo executive cloned Cuil called it Yuil and gave it better results using Yahoo Boss – then he had to remove it.

Also Netscape is owned by AOL

Reply

34 JumboCasher.com August 29, 2008 at 1:03 pm

Its all about the money honey… and googles got it in plenty!

Reply

35 Cigar Inspector August 29, 2008 at 1:28 pm

Just noticed your new upgraded design (I’m using a feed reader). Looks great!

Reply

36 Ranked Hard August 29, 2008 at 1:52 pm

Shoe,

If Yahoo had outbid Google to become the default engine they would have been making a humongous mistake. Most Firefox users are tech savvy and would just change the default to Google. Throwing money away like that is Microsoft’s department. Talk to them about outbidding Google.

Yahoo is tied up in funding Flock anyway.

Reply

37 Jewellery August 29, 2008 at 6:46 pm

Most people who aren’t tech savvy also know how to change their homepage just like they have been setting it in Internet Explorer.

Reply

38 meethere August 29, 2008 at 2:09 pm

I think they are earning from per search made..
OR a share from sponsored ads click..

Reply

39 GolfBargainHunters August 29, 2008 at 2:17 pm

It’s very hard to compete against Microsoft, even if you have better technology. So the money that Google pay Mozilla is very important for their existence.

Reply

40 poor jokes August 29, 2008 at 2:20 pm

this seems right logic that yahoo shoud invest on firefox that would help building its user base

Reply

41 jim of Blueprint for Financial Prosperity August 29, 2008 at 2:41 pm

I think it’s great that Google supports Firefox, it’s my browser of choice. IE simply doesn’t compare to the features FF offered even a few versions ago. IE’s catching up, but it’s still late to the party.

Reply

42 web hosting rebates August 29, 2008 at 4:20 pm

I won’t say that they are late to the party because they are still leading browser market share. Firefox has somewhere around 19%-20% and IE around 70%-72%

Reply

43 Monty's Mega Marketing August 29, 2008 at 2:53 pm

The ultimate irony is that I’ve changed my Firefox home page to Yahoo.com.

Reply

44 SEO Tricks August 29, 2008 at 3:39 pm

HAHA! Even its same with me… I was sick of that Google FireFox Page

Reply

45 Jewellery August 29, 2008 at 6:46 pm

The Google Firefox Homepage is nice, infact they should make their site have that background consistently.

Reply

46 web hosting rebates August 29, 2008 at 4:12 pm

one thing I don’t like at yahoo is that once I log out from my email, they are redirecting me to their homepage (what if I would wanted to login to another email account !?!)…I quickly hit the x button. That’s why I can’t stand their homepage.

Reply

47 Amit August 29, 2008 at 3:52 pm

Hell yeah! But Google has made the deal more lucrative for Firefox

Reply

48 Zac Johnson August 29, 2008 at 4:59 pm

FireFox is awesome, and wouldn’t be the same without the funding from Google… just like the millions received in donations at Wikipedia.

Reply

49 team ray August 29, 2008 at 5:09 pm

yes it would exist

if you have a great product

Reply

50 Jewellery August 29, 2008 at 6:47 pm

It would exist but it wouldn’t have got to the stage it is at now due to Google providing 85% of its funding.

Reply

51 JR @ Internet Marketing Strategies August 29, 2008 at 5:13 pm

I am happy too, Firefox rules, especially when you look at the alternative piece of crap called IE!

Reply

52 Stelian Andrei August 29, 2008 at 5:47 pm

Firefox has a long history if you take into account the fact that it’s based on Netscape. On top of that, it’s installed by default in several *NIX operating systems (which are slowly but surely gaining terrain). I wouldn’t be surprised if someday I see Microsoft scrape IE and offer Firefox as default browser (or something based on Firefox, maybe Internet Fox or Foxplorer or any other stupid name).

In my opinion, even without the Google fundings, Firefox would continue to exist and improve. There is a large community of users and developers sustaining it.

Reply

53 Andy August 29, 2008 at 7:01 pm

You’re right Shoe, without the funding it wouldn’t be where it is. If Linux received this type of funding, it probably would have gone much further as well, though the opensource geeks prefer to pretend everything can be ideal on a completely volunteer, even socialist basis, people need monetary support in order to live and spend a great deal of time developing great products.

Reply

54 Patrick August 29, 2008 at 9:00 pm

I’m not surprised. That partnership is quite nice. $180M for 3 years… not too bad. Go Firefox! Go Google! Go Obama ;) !

Reply

55 Tom Jones August 29, 2008 at 9:04 pm

I am glad they have the funding also. Firefox has been my main browser of for several years.

Reply

56 LetUsReviewIt August 29, 2008 at 9:13 pm

I think firefox is living in a fantasy world if they think they would be anything without google.

Reply

57 Noobpreneur August 29, 2008 at 9:40 pm

Capitalism does offer us opportunity – to enjoy a more secure browsing experience with more powerful tools added-on :P

Hopefully, by being (close) to Google, Fifrefox and its user worldwide will enjoy some ‘perks’ ;)

Reply

58 TEGS August 30, 2008 at 12:58 am

Mozilla in general rocks. They offer so many apps. Firefox, Gimp, Filezilla, KompoZer. All for free. It will constantly evolve because its open source.

Reply

59 Oozzl networking August 30, 2008 at 2:01 am

Firefox would have been killed by Microsoft if Google didn’t fund them.
Great job, Google….

Reply

60 Oozzl networking August 30, 2008 at 2:52 am
61 Andy Blackburn August 30, 2008 at 2:55 am

Even as a big fan of Firefox, I’ve had to switch to Safari until 3.0.2 is out, as 3.0.1′s memory and CPU usages issues grind my relatively high performing PC to a standstill.

Here’s to some of Sergie’s cash pushing the next update out a little quicker!

Reply

62 Dick August 30, 2008 at 7:39 am

Google makes a very correct bet on Mozilla. That gives him a huge advantage. I think that Google increases its influence through this.

Reply

63 SawanM August 30, 2008 at 10:07 am

Google made a very good move by doing this, Firefox is the best browser alive, and will be so for a long time.

Reply

64 Lowongan Kerja August 30, 2008 at 12:21 pm

I think it is a win-win solution for them.. and us

Reply

65 Scot August 30, 2008 at 2:34 pm

Does Google (through Performics) even offer their affiliate program from Firefox anymore?

Reply

66 Reid August 30, 2008 at 2:36 pm

Yeah my life wouldn’t be complete without Firefox. As a web designer/developer Firefox is amazing, I just wish someone would make using IE against the law or something because it sucks!

Reply

67 Dick August 31, 2008 at 5:30 am

IE is a base browser for many backward countries. Almost half of all Internet users enjoy them.

Reply

68 Joshua August 30, 2008 at 3:05 pm

My Firefox has a hole in it! Leaking memory…

Reply

69 SawanM August 30, 2008 at 5:27 pm

No problem if you have a good computer.

Reply

70 Stephanie August 30, 2008 at 3:32 pm

It’s a pretty good deal for Firefox, either way. Pick the top search engine and use it as a default on your browser. If they want to pay for it, so much the better.

Reply

71 David Brown Online August 30, 2008 at 5:40 pm

If not google, Im sure other companies will jump in too. Firefox, Opera, anything mozilla has a precense in Windows, UNIX, PDA’s, Cell Phones. Having google back it obviously will beneficial for us users as they can continue to bring us more releases

Reply

72 Custom T-Shirts August 30, 2008 at 5:44 pm

As an open source project, I’m not sure why Mozilla requires $180 million to operate in the first place…

Reply

73 Eva White August 30, 2008 at 11:54 pm

Come on it makes sense. Given a choice who would you align yourself with Yahoo or Google. Of course the cash must sweeten the deal.

Reply

74 TylerC August 31, 2008 at 11:11 pm

Good, keeping Mozilla’s pockets lined will continue to push competition at Microsoft in turn ending developers headaches as they clean up IE.

Reply

75 Dustin Cucciarre September 1, 2008 at 12:18 am

Oh yea they would be around but not nearly as big.

Reply

76 sergio.dares September 1, 2008 at 7:23 am

Firefox is great product – why not?

Reply

77 mohawkdonkey September 1, 2008 at 3:09 pm

fire fox allows me to download music off of YouTube with one of thier plug INS. Saving me shit tons of money. Long live fire fox. Capitalism too. God bless America.

Reply

78 Craig September 2, 2008 at 2:26 pm

I wonder if the release of Chrome will change this? It seems like it would be sensible for Google to stop funding the competition if they want to ensure their browser dominates…

Reply

79 Kenneth Dreyer September 3, 2008 at 9:41 pm

I’m sure they would still be around.. actually, they would probably be funded by MSN instead!

Reply

80 jack September 9, 2008 at 5:24 am

yeah probably , if google stops the funding , yahoo will jump right in (since they can’t make a deal with chrome) ..

Reply

81 Ways To Earn Online September 10, 2008 at 1:37 pm

Thats good for Mozilla. I love Firefox anyway. Google and firefox makes a great combination.

Reply

82 CultureMob.com September 15, 2008 at 7:56 pm

NO.

Reply

83 Harish October 8, 2008 at 4:06 am

I agree that firefox is loved by people world wide.I would say that it can exist without google but it need google too.

Reply

84 the flip August 14, 2010 at 2:05 am

I currently have been using Microsoft’s IE.

Reply

85 Hipolito M. Wiseman August 24, 2010 at 5:16 pm

it is grate tiffany bolg. thanks

Reply

86 bob March 24, 2011 at 3:02 pm

you mad a grammatical mistake. it should be ‘there’ not ‘their’ in your final line of the piece

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: