<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dmoz Links Are Worth Gold In Googles Eyes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shoemoney.com/2008/05/28/dmoz-links-are-worth-gold-in-googles-eyes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2008/05/28/dmoz-links-are-worth-gold-in-googles-eyes/</link>
	<description>By Jeremy Schoemaker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 08:23:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DRK</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2008/05/28/dmoz-links-are-worth-gold-in-googles-eyes/#comment-133284</link>
		<dc:creator>DRK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoemoney.com/?p=1406#comment-133284</guid>
		<description>Here is a review I made myself over &quot;Open source&quot; top category at DMOZ. I started my revision to find some site not complying with DMOZ guidelines. But I&#039;ve got surprised by the number of wrong listing in there. As you can read in this article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.drk.com.ar/archives/45-DMOZ-Open-source-category-dissection.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blog.drk.com.ar/archives/45-DMOZ-Open-source-category-dissection.html&lt;/a&gt;

Contrary to what I was expecting, such major category is in very bad shape. With sites not matching the subject or abandoned for the last eight years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a review I made myself over &#8220;Open source&#8221; top category at DMOZ. I started my revision to find some site not complying with DMOZ guidelines. But I&#8217;ve got surprised by the number of wrong listing in there. As you can read in this article: <a href="http://blog.drk.com.ar/archives/45-DMOZ-Open-source-category-dissection.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.drk.com.ar/archives/45-DMOZ-Open-source-category-dissection.html</a></p>
<p>Contrary to what I was expecting, such major category is in very bad shape. With sites not matching the subject or abandoned for the last eight years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DRK Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2008/05/28/dmoz-links-are-worth-gold-in-googles-eyes/#comment-133250</link>
		<dc:creator>DRK Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoemoney.com/?p=1406#comment-133250</guid>
		<description>If you get listed from DMOZ your page rank will improve —that&#039;s for sure.
But, getting listed in DMOZ is almost impossible unless you have good luck and end up with a decent editor (not seen all the time on DMOZ).
If you check ten DMOZ categories you will find sites violating DMOZ rules in five of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you get listed from DMOZ your page rank will improve —that&#8217;s for sure.<br />
But, getting listed in DMOZ is almost impossible unless you have good luck and end up with a decent editor (not seen all the time on DMOZ).<br />
If you check ten DMOZ categories you will find sites violating DMOZ rules in five of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scumbag</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2008/05/28/dmoz-links-are-worth-gold-in-googles-eyes/#comment-112973</link>
		<dc:creator>scumbag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 09:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoemoney.com/?p=1406#comment-112973</guid>
		<description>Your site has all that. You don&#039;t need dmoz. f**K em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your site has all that. You don&#8217;t need dmoz. f**K em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woqer</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2008/05/28/dmoz-links-are-worth-gold-in-googles-eyes/#comment-95341</link>
		<dc:creator>Woqer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoemoney.com/?p=1406#comment-95341</guid>
		<description>I am trying to use DMOZ - nothing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am trying to use DMOZ &#8211; nothing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forumistan</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2008/05/28/dmoz-links-are-worth-gold-in-googles-eyes/#comment-71482</link>
		<dc:creator>forumistan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoemoney.com/?p=1406#comment-71482</guid>
		<description>If you have a link in dmoz, your pr + 2 ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have a link in dmoz, your pr + 2 <img src='http://www.shoemoney.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Epurplemedia – online marketing news</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2008/05/28/dmoz-links-are-worth-gold-in-googles-eyes/#comment-70002</link>
		<dc:creator>Epurplemedia – online marketing news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 05:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoemoney.com/?p=1406#comment-70002</guid>
		<description>dmoz is a very popular and free directory. Its very difficult to be listed in the directory. Getting link with dmoz which has 8 pr and very popularly definately help you in getting good link but not in serp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dmoz is a very popular and free directory. Its very difficult to be listed in the directory. Getting link with dmoz which has 8 pr and very popularly definately help you in getting good link but not in serp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urban Wear Addict</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2008/05/28/dmoz-links-are-worth-gold-in-googles-eyes/#comment-69755</link>
		<dc:creator>Urban Wear Addict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoemoney.com/?p=1406#comment-69755</guid>
		<description>Really, DMOZ doesn&#039;t have that much weight these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, DMOZ doesn&#8217;t have that much weight these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
