Dec 27 2007
Jeremy Schoemaker

Chris Crompton’s Coopertive Link Exchange Network - Powered by Amazon

By Jeremy Schoemaker 45 comments

I got tipped off earlier this week (while traveling) about a new coopertive linking system that is disguised as a article distribution system powered by Amazon Mechanical Turk.

AWS Developer Chris Crompton has built the Content Spooling Network (CSN) using Amazon Mechanical Turk. CSN has modularized the entire ghostwriting process into discrete tasks and leverages Mechanical Turk workers to complete them. Using this methodology, CSN is able to provide this service to hundreds of webmasters each week allowing them to drive more traffic to their sites and further monetize their web properties.

The homepage for the content/ghostwriting service actually talks very little about their article service but focuses more on the SEO value for such a service:

From the first page testimonial:

link netowrk

Sure enough currently the dipshit from theearlofrealestate.com, who is bragging about his SEO rankings by using the Google manipulating system, ranks tops for his Real Estate terms:

5th for Northern Virginia Real Estate
3rd for Northern Virginia condos

But the question would be then… Can Google detect and fingerprint the links to them? Well most of them are article databases/directories which I assume Google as discredited a long time ago… But the blogs will be a little bit harder to track down. I have found a few small fingerprints for them which I am sure anyone reading with a few minutes can track down also ;)

  1. FF0000
    mubin said on December 27th, 2007 at 1:14 pm

    They probably already have it all figured out. Give them two weeks to lay the smackdown on these suckers.

    I hope it doesnt mess with my sites serps though. Im rocking the house at the moment.

  2. FF0000
    Fat Man said on December 27th, 2007 at 1:15 pm

    these peeps that are always gaming the system suck and do good. they cause google to make it google better.

  3. FF0000
    Famous Quotes said on December 27th, 2007 at 1:22 pm

    Trying to game google is always a bad idea.

  4. FF0000
    mutt said on December 27th, 2007 at 1:28 pm

    i like the backlink to matt cutts’ blog:

    http://buscador.lycos.es/cgi-bin/pursuit?query=linkdomain%3Atheearlofrealestate.net

    nofollow..but it is a totally shameless advertisment “robert earl”..well done!

  5. FF0000
    VaBeachKevin said on December 27th, 2007 at 1:31 pm

    I’ve got no problem with people trying to do what they need to to get better rankings, but once you find something that is working shut the hell up about it!!! These morons kill me with all the bragging about how they can beat Google.

  6. FF0000
    Peter Davis said on December 27th, 2007 at 1:46 pm

    I wonder why this guy is using theearlofrealestate.net when earlofrealestate.com is unregistered. Not that either of them are particularly good names, but this guy might have some reputation issues if some porn site gets ahold of earlofrealestate.com

  7. FF0000
    Webmaster Forum said on December 27th, 2007 at 1:57 pm

    Maybe the rankings will last for a couple of weeks !! But honestly will always pay off at long term

  8. FF0000
    Interwebhunt said on December 27th, 2007 at 1:57 pm

    I agree with VaBeachKevin - if you find something that works, use it for a bit and don’t shout it to the world. OR politely tell Google (or whomever it is) about the loophole so that the system can be made stronger.

  9. FF0000
    Chris Edwards said on December 27th, 2007 at 2:07 pm

    BWAHAHAHAHA, Dipshit is pure comedy Shoe!
    So thumbs up or thumbs down to this system? I think I can guess the answer but we gotta hear from the man!

  10. FF0000
    Jeremy Schoemaker said on December 27th, 2007 at 2:20 pm

    for technology and distribution - thumbs up
    for marketing and business plan - thumbs down

  11. FF0000
    SEO for Yahoo Small Business - Terry Reeves said on December 27th, 2007 at 2:28 pm

    All spam techniques work for some amount of time. I use to rank sites using the alt image tag. That doesn’t work anymore.

  12. FF0000
    Ken Savage said on December 27th, 2007 at 2:49 pm

    could you be any more obvious Peter?

    Who will be the first to get this domain and spam a pr0n wordpress blog on it?

    Double Dog dare ya!

  13. FF0000
    Jeremy Schoemaker said on December 27th, 2007 at 7:13 pm

    te4

  14. FF0000
    Nicholas James said on December 27th, 2007 at 7:20 pm

    Something gives me the inclination that Google will quickly realise this is happening and make the algo’s different again. Which will inturn help the sites, that aren’t “cheating” to fire up the rankings with no work.

  15. FF0000
    Nicholas James said on December 27th, 2007 at 7:20 pm

    Have to agree on that. Their marketing plan must be “launch…they will come” and as for their business plan don’t get me started ;)

  16. FF0000
    VacationGuy said on December 27th, 2007 at 7:33 pm

    intresting post

  17. FF0000
    VacationGuy said on December 27th, 2007 at 8:13 pm

    i agree google probably has 100 guys that are 100 times smarter than he is and they are paying them enough they only focus on google

  18. FF0000
    Nick Sullivan said on December 27th, 2007 at 8:18 pm

    I suspect Google will catch on with the aid of the this post :)

  19. FF0000
    Contest Beat said on December 27th, 2007 at 8:20 pm

    The bragging isn’t needed

  20. FF0000
    Alan Johnson said on December 27th, 2007 at 8:25 pm

    This is beyond hilarious: you’d think that people trying to fly under the radar would keep a low profile but no, they have to brag about it as well.

    Alan Johnson

  21. FF0000
    Daniel Larsson said on December 27th, 2007 at 8:44 pm

    Its amazing that so many people put so much energy into trying to con the system.

    I have been working online for years and the ONLY thing that holds true is still - QUALITY CONTENT + HARD WORK = GOOD SERPS!

  22. FF0000
    Affiliate Confession said on December 27th, 2007 at 9:58 pm

    Amen! If you found a way to out evil the evil Google, don’t tell anybody about it.

  23. FF0000
    Affiliate Confession said on December 27th, 2007 at 10:03 pm

    I don’t know, if Google wasn’t trying so incredibly hard to find any reason to keep sites out of their index, maybe people wouldn’t be trying to find a way around it. There’s a story every day about a legit site getting axed for no good reason.

  24. FF0000
    賃貸 大阪 said on December 27th, 2007 at 10:13 pm

    I always wonder the same thing. Why ask for a fight with someone more powerful than you? That is another reason I respect Greg, DaveN, etc. They never brag about what they are doing.

  25. FF0000
    affiliate unleashed said on December 27th, 2007 at 10:20 pm

    Hahaha good post. I wanna make a test site to try this out :D

  26. FF0000
    Alan Johnson said on December 27th, 2007 at 10:23 pm

    People would always try to develop some sort of edge by whatever means necessary but again, bragging instead of just keeping a low profile and hoping that your attempt will remain unnoticed is just plain foolish.

    Alan Johnson

  27. FF0000
    bloggernoob said on December 27th, 2007 at 10:24 pm

    is it that hard to get 5th and 6th for those weak ass search terms. is it necessary to pay money to do this?

  28. FF0000
    Steve! said on December 28th, 2007 at 3:47 am

    I used Mechanical Turk, biggest waste of time ever. This sounds good though.

  29. FF0000
    seo audit said on December 28th, 2007 at 4:04 am

    Sooner or later they will be cached.Coop networks don’t worth the effort.

  30. FF0000
    Tudi said on December 28th, 2007 at 6:59 am

    Peter, not that I don’t like your idea of registering a porn site for that domain name, but what kind of weird fetish theme would one use for earlofrealestate.com lol.

    I agree that honesty will keep you up in the long run, but sometimes even Google needs a push. You just need to know when to put the black pirate hat down :)

  31. FF0000
    Omar Yesid Mariño said on December 28th, 2007 at 8:58 am

    I don’t know why some people believe they are smarter than a group of people working for Google (and users reporting to Google)… I don’t know… I think it is a waste of time.

  32. FF0000
    Hustle Strategy said on December 28th, 2007 at 9:14 am

    true, no one to blame but themselves.

  33. FF0000
    Hustle Strategy said on December 28th, 2007 at 9:15 am

    its got a site on it right?

  34. FF0000
    Hustle Strategy said on December 28th, 2007 at 9:18 am

    seems shoe is trying to gain points with the big google.

  35. FF0000
    Hustle Strategy said on December 28th, 2007 at 9:20 am

    even worse when they publicize what they are doing. like kids video taping themselves doing crimes…

  36. FF0000
    Chris Crompton said on December 28th, 2007 at 12:05 pm

    The content spooling network is an article marketing service. I don’t know anybody who thinks article marketing is scamming Google. Each submitted article will go to around 20 related sites and 20 or so external article directories… hardly worth a crackdown by Google.

    Content Spooling Network members are in it for the long-term. We don’t build value by exploiting a loophole… we do it by publishing content to related websites.

  37. FF0000
    Affiliate Unleashed said on December 28th, 2007 at 1:07 pm

    True. It’s hilarious. I guess people dont realize they can exploit it to make a huge amount if they didnt blab.

  38. FF0000
    Dave said on December 28th, 2007 at 1:39 pm

    Yeah, I’m not really sure why people think this is so funny or even newsworthy. Networks like this have been around for awhile, including this one which has probably been around for at least a year.

    So in terms of black hat, grey hat, and white hat….I would say this leans more towards white hat when you compare it to other tactics. Trading content with other webmasters has never been a bad thing. That’s essentially what shoemoney does when he has patel come on here.

    besides, i’m not totally convinced that theearlofrealestate.com is the site that’s actually inside the network.

  39. FF0000
    WD said on December 28th, 2007 at 2:51 pm

    I’m pretty sure it’s the real estate site. Just follow the articles link, and you’ll see the good old category structure you found in so many link exchange programs, just instead of directory style links they’re in the article content. Go to the sites linked to, and they all have the similar structure. Chris may say they’re related articles, but not sure how Car stereo articles relate to a real estate site. In looking at one of these, I also found a scraper site that was pulling the article without the links.

    I don’t really have a problem with people trying these approaches, it’s just don’t try to spin what you’re doing as being anything other than an automated link exchange.

  40. FF0000
    Contest Beat said on December 28th, 2007 at 11:35 pm

    Yeah, they were good a few years ago though

  41. FF0000
    Alojate said on December 28th, 2007 at 11:38 pm

    As always, they will be catch by google. No use waisting time with these.
    What people don’t realize is that original content, even one article is more valuable that thousand of links with little or no value.

  42. FF0000
    jen_chan, writer surefirewealth.com said on December 29th, 2007 at 3:41 am

    Google has been wonderful in every sense of the word. It has done so much and has provided significant help through its innovations. I hipe it continues to do its job well.

  43. FF0000
    Nick Dalton said on December 31st, 2007 at 6:23 pm

    I don’t see how this is any different from regular article marketing.

    You write an article and submit it to CSN. It is reviewed by CSN (using Amazon Mechanical Turk). If the article is approved it is then distributed by CSN to standard article directories and several other web sites that have indicated that they are interested in accepting articles on that topic.

    Just like regular article marketing you get to place a link to your own site in the resource section at the bottom of the article. Some web sites and article directories also accept links within the article itself. CSN takes care of formatting the article and removing links as required by each site that the article is submitted to.

    If you call EzineArticles.com, and other articles directories and article submission services, “cooperative linking systems” then I guess you can place CSN in that category too.

  44. FF0000
    Utah SEO said on January 6th, 2008 at 10:32 pm

    21 day free trial! I’ll test it out for the hell of it. I love how they say “a special white-hat technique is used”.

  45. [...] Chris Crompton’s Coopertive Link Exchange Network - Powered by Amazon, ShoeMoney [...]

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.