Oct 29 2007
Jeremy Schoemaker

Fun Numbers

By Jeremy Schoemaker 56 comments

8,500+ - Views on YouTube in the first TWO DAYS for PamCakes SEM recap video Considering it was posted early Saturday morning and the weekend is about 60% less traffic on my blog then during the week I think she might want to consider a future in video blogging on SEM ;).

Pam Lund

34,100 - Is the number of dumb asses who just told google they are selling paid links (its so funny people running around wondering what magic algorithm Google is using to figure out who is selling paid links…..)

Course a bunch of those are doups but an interesting query…

13,600 blogs mention pagerank in the last 7 days

7 is the Google Pagerank that copy blogger Brian Clark ended up with after the b5 blog network brass called up Google and raised some hell.

  1. wethead said on October 29th, 2007 at 2:18 pm

    haha - Great #’s :)

    Yet people still think “google is dumb” and can’t see this stuff,

    I love how people forget the “one” “golden rule”

    GOOGLE BUILT GOOGLE !

    Its like someone coming into your house knowing all the “secret spots” , yea you know like the places you hide money etc,

    So why do people think that a company worth BILLIONS and $500 + a share stock can’t see paid or bad links,

    Nice post and for all you link sellers, they will catch you , youll see :)

    [Reply]

  2. Domtan said on October 29th, 2007 at 2:19 pm

    8,650+. Big number. The professional term for this called “Sexy Internet Marketing.”

    [Reply]

  3. King Jacob said on October 29th, 2007 at 2:31 pm

    If they still want to sell links, why dont they just do it privately over a forum?

    [Reply]

  4. HustleStrategy said on October 29th, 2007 at 2:35 pm

    numbers seem to be changing all the time… pamcakes, seems like just a few weeks ago she made a video with shoemoney garb…

    [Reply]

  5. Paul said on October 29th, 2007 at 2:39 pm

    Now it would be nice which country most of those 34,100(and climbing) dumb asses live…

    [Reply]

  6. The Fat Boy said on October 29th, 2007 at 2:41 pm

    I got hit, and then I got hit again… same site. Cheeky bastards!

    [Reply]

  7. Tracy Robinson said on October 29th, 2007 at 2:53 pm

    Man, my page rank went from a PR0 to a PR-2, can they really do that? Maybe if I pay people a nickel a link I can get it to go really really high.

    [Reply]

  8. Justin Cook said on October 29th, 2007 at 2:56 pm

    Umm, no…. These people are placing a call to a PHP function on their website. The PHP code should be invisible, as it’s executed server-side. If implemented properly, the TLA code should be transparent on a website…

    [Reply]

  9. Gecko Tales said on October 29th, 2007 at 2:59 pm

    Put a pretty girl on anything and it does better. No longer will I be a balding guy with a gut. Now I’m going to only show myself as a hot 21 year old coed. That should help my stats.

    [Reply]

  10. Tom said on October 29th, 2007 at 3:11 pm

    How come I only see 4,430 on Pam’s youtube video? Do they not count off-site views? If not that is crap considering they are all loading off of their server.

    [Reply]

  11. ShoeMoney said on October 29th, 2007 at 3:12 pm

    i think stats are delayed quite a bit

    [Reply]

  12. ray said on October 29th, 2007 at 3:13 pm

    umm yes thats why they are dumbasses. Course a dumbass cant see that ;)

    [Reply]

  13. Collin said on October 29th, 2007 at 3:34 pm

    Well she did do a great job and deserves that kinda of attention.

    [Reply]

  14. dillsmack said on October 29th, 2007 at 3:38 pm

    Your consistency with dumbass comments amazes me.

    [Reply]

  15. serge said on October 29th, 2007 at 3:46 pm

    do you know how many of those views came directly from Youtube, yoursite, or google search? would be interesting to know. I did a video for my business and it comes up on the first page usually in the first three sites for my key words. Video is the way to go.

    [Reply]

  16. big money said on October 29th, 2007 at 3:51 pm

    Here’s what I’m wondering, how could copy blogger just call up Google and ask for a higher pagerank? Does anyone know the phone number to Google? I think I want a higher pagerank too lol.

    [Reply]

  17. JoeTech.com said on October 29th, 2007 at 4:06 pm

    Nice… Now I wonder if all those bloggers will get penalized for the TLA or if Google is only going to make examples of more known blogs.

    [Reply]

  18. Tim Spangler said on October 29th, 2007 at 4:39 pm

    And remember to chmod your WordPress plugins directory so random people can’t pull a list of all the plugins you use.

    [Reply]

  19. John M Weaver said on October 29th, 2007 at 4:54 pm

    its all about who you know…I sure don’t know anyone at Google! :(

    [Reply]

  20. Brian Clark said on October 29th, 2007 at 5:41 pm

    PR 7 is the rank Copyblogger would have gotten regardless, if only I hadn’t been wrongly lumped in with other who got the “warning” from Google.

    [Reply]

  21. John said on October 29th, 2007 at 6:18 pm

    She could read out the alphabet and get that many views…

    [Reply]

  22. RJ said on October 29th, 2007 at 7:15 pm

    Pamcakes definately did a great job with the video post. She should definitely keep it up.

    [Reply]

  23. arturo said on October 29th, 2007 at 7:54 pm

    or just turn off indexes via htaccess so you don’t have to sweat individual folders…

    [Reply]

  24. Dave said on October 29th, 2007 at 7:58 pm

    It’s not about seeing the TLA code on your site. It works like this:

    1) TLA used to allow a buyer to view the site they were about to purchase a link on. People always thought it didn’t matter because Google couldn’t actually see the sites, only humans could. But what about humans that work at google? Danger!
    2) Software starts with a handful of sites that sell links, then follows those links to link buyers. Software goes out and finds other links with the same anchor text to discover more sellers and does a similar analysis on that site to determine if they actually are link sellers.
    3) Repeat 50million times and you have a crapload of sites. But just by starting with a bunch of sites of known link sellers and known link buyers, you can find a lot.

    I’ve talked to someone who has seen it demonstrated (the employee who built the software went on to work at Google). It’s mostly a manual process, but you can find thousands of link sellers in a matter of minutes.

    I have no idea why TLA waited so long to hide their network of sites. TLB has been doing it for a long time. I guess everyone just needs to get a littler sneakier.

    [Reply]

  25. Jonathan Volk said on October 29th, 2007 at 8:46 pm

    Yes, but who did you contact to solve this issue.

    [Reply]

  26. Jonathan Volk said on October 29th, 2007 at 8:48 pm

    One of my sites got penalized. Meh oh well. Anywho, some interesting numbers for sure.

    Thanks,
    Jony

    [Reply]

  27. MyGoodFinds said on October 29th, 2007 at 9:02 pm

    Very Interesting. I didn’t even bother blogging anything with “pagerank” anymore. I had more fun outdoors!

    [Reply]

  28. louie said on October 29th, 2007 at 9:07 pm

    I know how you can double your traffic, put her in a bikini holding a Makita drill!

    [Reply]

  29. Blog Contests said on October 30th, 2007 at 12:30 am

    Google basically solely targeting one company - TLA…

    With that and AA going to sh*t they must be worried.

    [Reply]

  30. 賃貸 大阪 said on October 30th, 2007 at 1:02 am

    I was thinking the same thing. Bath Booths for YouTube?

    [Reply]

  31. 賃貸 大阪 said on October 30th, 2007 at 1:04 am

    It is too bad because they are the best. The fulfillment is superior to TLB. But I always worried about a mole from Google looking for the sites selling links.

    [Reply]

  32. blogstheme.com said on October 30th, 2007 at 4:35 am

    And now it’s almost 13k! The video was great! A lot better than all the other SEO blog videos that I ever seen.
    When I first saw her I was thinking that she was going to read some script, but she doesnt look like that! Great job shoe!

    [Reply]

  33. Seo Next said on October 30th, 2007 at 4:44 am

    Great i always like to watch youtube videos.i have just saw this video and it is good.

    [Reply]

  34. shy guy said on October 30th, 2007 at 8:45 am

    Awesome video…

    [Reply]

  35. Mike said on October 30th, 2007 at 8:46 am

    I’m finding that adsense on my many sites is paying diddly. I mean ridiculous. Are there other programs that would be worth looking at? I’m in the golf niche, so I need targeted ads for golfers. I look forward to hearing from somone (or maybe even Jeremy;)).

    [Reply]

  36. CPA Affiliates said on October 30th, 2007 at 10:09 am

    those are some interesting numbers… especially the TLA ;)

    [Reply]

  37. Varadinum said on October 30th, 2007 at 11:27 am

    Great video!

    [Reply]

  38. San Diego SEO said on October 30th, 2007 at 2:44 pm

    I made some suggestions to their videos on my blog… They can be better…

    [Reply]

  39. Neon said on October 30th, 2007 at 4:30 pm

    not everyone is technically good at coding. most just apply certain plugin. for us better knowledge in coding, we can implement it better with transparency. sometimes, their site have scripting problem.. which output errors… and so ‘fortunately’ google indexed the error page.

    [Reply]

  40. Neon said on October 30th, 2007 at 4:33 pm

    Since most of the people in this industry are male, it is so natural that we being tempted to watch/hear.

    [Reply]

  41. Neon said on October 30th, 2007 at 4:40 pm

    dont think google is interested in finding only few sites.
    they will want to find solution to hit the mass.
    however, they could go to TLA or similar marketplace as a customer and see how their implementation works.

    [Reply]

  42. Natural Fat Loss Patch said on October 30th, 2007 at 5:02 pm

    A lot of people are missing the fact that a lot of sites also saw a nice increase from this recent update that everyone is freaking out about.

    [Reply]

  43. Amit said on October 30th, 2007 at 7:43 pm

    wow thats a excellent number of views in a small time.

    [Reply]

  44. Joeychgo said on October 30th, 2007 at 9:38 pm

    No kidding! Thats Great!

    [Reply]

  45. Thousand Dollar Project said on November 1st, 2007 at 4:27 am

    Good going guys!

    [Reply]

  46. Thor Schrock said on November 1st, 2007 at 6:29 am

    Video is going to continue to increase in popularity and effectiveness as long as Internet marketers can continue to find new ways to integrate it into their marketing platforms without it looking like yesterday’s YouTube.

    [Reply]

  47. Rich Sage said on November 19th, 2007 at 2:28 am

    Well, I clicked on the number on the Net story to find only a few examples. I think you need a weekly update of the “Net by the Numbers”.

    [Reply]

  48. [...] #2: Shoemoney points out how easy it is to see who’s running TextLinkAds on their sites. Just do a Google [...]

  49. [...] ShoeMoney’s short but sweet post - please follow the links to find out what NOT to do [...]

  50. Matt Cutts interviene sull’aggiornamento PageRank! said on October 30th, 2007 at 5:03 pm

    [...] non abbia trovato il modo di penalizzare, automaticamente, tutti i siti che includono link venduti (secondo Shoemoney, è sufficiente googlare function tla_ads per scovare chi utilizza Text Link Ads ). matt cutts, [...]

  51. » Selling Links In A Google Controlled Internet said on November 17th, 2007 at 2:07 am

    [...] been selling Text Link Ads, it’s actually pretty simple. Shoemoney explained it in his Fun Numbers post. If you want to see all the sites running TLA, do a search for function tla_ads. The number [...]

  52. Selling Links In A Google Controlled Internet | SEOclient.com said on November 17th, 2007 at 4:56 am

    [...] been selling Text Link Ads, it’s actually pretty simple. Shoemoney explained it in his Fun Numbers post. If you want to see all the sites running TLA, do a search for function tla_ads. The number [...]

  53. [...] you’ve been selling Text Link Ads, it’s actually pretty simple. Shoemoney explained it in his Fun Numbers [...]

  54. Text Links Ads hides from Google and so do we said on November 21st, 2007 at 9:46 pm

    [...] Before, the script that works like any other plugin, had a name like tla_1234xxx.php, and was easily detected by Google.  Now we can name the script file whatever we want and it´s different for each [...]

  55. Text Link Ads’ Action to Get Rid of Google Problems said on November 23rd, 2007 at 2:18 pm

    [...] link juice, which I’ve learned from John Chow who’ve learned about it through Jeremy Schoemaker. If you are running an old TLA plugin, then you need to upgrade to the latest one right away. If [...]

  56. [...] there’s a work-around all of these. You can still sell TLA without being penalized by Google. Shoemoney has blogged about it. Ever wondered how Google knew you were selling Text Link Ads? The key happens to be in the TLA [...]

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.