Don’t Make Google Look Stupid - Period

125 responses..


BTW I post a lot of videos on YouTube that I do not post on my blog. If you would like to be notified when new ones are posted you can subscribe to my youtube profile (currently over 10,000 subscribers)




Related Posts:

  • Scraper Code All Over Google Code Search
  • David Pogue Is Another Dumbshit Tech Writer
  • Scary Feedburner Message At Login
  • posted on October 6th, 2007:
    Written By: ShoeMoney

    125 Comments

    @October 6, 2007 10:06 pm
    mike Says:

    Shoe,

    I am normally not a fan of yours but I just wanted to say this is the first post I have seen that is SOOO dead on about Google and how they operate. People get so caught up in the Google grandstanding they lose sight of what Google is… just another advertising company. Thanks for breaking it down.

    @October 7, 2007 11:03 am
    Joeychgo Says:

    I couldnt agree more

    @October 8, 2007 11:50 pm

    People have started thinking of google as god .. the sole reason of this being their kind of monopoly in the internet arena.
    Let us find a way to break this monopoly and make internet better for us.

    @October 12, 2007 7:36 pm
    MR Butts Says:

    Google is a joke… and matt cutts an even bigger one to think he and google will be stopping anything any time soon. Build backlinks and reach the top of googles great ego…. sorry ALGO

    (Comments wont nest below this level)
     
     
     
     
    @October 6, 2007 10:32 pm
    browie Says:

    I subscribe. But you’re like 2nd or 3rd on the list… Brigitte Dale is number #1 and then you and Thor are tied at 2. I don’t watch youtube much for “subscriptions”

     
    @October 6, 2007 10:35 pm

    Hahaha, total Douchebag comment cracked me up!

     
    @October 6, 2007 10:39 pm

    [...] å?­å??彩.é¦?港å?­&aring… wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptBTW I post a lot of videos on YouTube that I do not post on my blog. If you would like to be notifie [...]

     
    @October 6, 2007 10:41 pm

    [...] Leigh wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptBTW I post a lot of videos on YouTube that I do not post on my blog. If you would like to be notified when new ones are posted you can subscribe to my youtube profile (currently over 10000 subscribers) [...]

     
    @October 6, 2007 10:43 pm

    I agree, never fuck with those that have authority over you. That means the government and Google.

    @October 8, 2007 6:26 am
    Seo Next Says:

    Ya if we whant to make sites never try to go against google presently.

     
     
    @October 6, 2007 10:57 pm
    Jake Says:

    Good point. Use common sense, play the game, get search results.

     
    @October 6, 2007 11:18 pm

    Well Said Jeremy !

     
    @October 6, 2007 11:42 pm
    Craig Says:

    You say don’t make google look stupid but recently they have been making themselves look stupid. The rules are enforced to some sites, and then overlooked to others. Many authority sites break the new rules and have seen no affects, but many others have. Also, I agree that search traffic isn’t everything. There are other sites than Google, and it is nice to focus on your users and not the search engine. After all, who is actually using your site?

    @October 7, 2007 5:40 pm
    CFernandes Says:

    I also think it is ridiculous that Text Link Ads and John Chow don´t rank #1 for there own names. For a search engine it doesn´t get any more IRRELEVANT than that!

     
     
    @October 7, 2007 12:07 am
    wethead Says:

    Hey Shoe,

    The whole paid links thing does get weirder by the day, I will agree with that,

    I also agree with what you said about google.

    If you embarrass them, they will make you look just as dumb,

    So, Yea..I just keep telling myself,

    Make the users happy and everyone will be happy :)

    ~Joe

     
    @October 7, 2007 12:15 am
    Israel Says:

    hmm, makes me think you are calling attention to yourself.

    @October 7, 2007 10:08 am

    That doesn’t even make sense! He didn’t once mention himself, except at the end of the post with the note that this site receives only 4% se traffic…

     
     
    @October 7, 2007 12:18 am

    No words truer spoken.

     
    @October 7, 2007 12:26 am

    10,000 subs on your YouTube profile? Dang you are doing well!

    @October 7, 2007 12:55 am

    Yeah, especially since (as far as I know), it wasn’t referenced on the blog. Congrats.

    As for the post, you would think instead of completely removing a site from the index, it would just stop it from ranking for anything other than its own name.

    Anyone that Googles “john chow” has to have a reason to know his name, so I think he should rank #1 for that no matter what.

    @October 7, 2007 1:29 am

    So true. Makes you wonder if they edit one by one or do they just click a button that makes all sites terms -30 or whatever (in most cases, since Jeremy obviously was added for that one term). Of course, maybe they meant to do that in this specific case for whatever reason.

     
    @October 8, 2007 4:11 pm
    Googlelady Says:

    But why he will be ranked well when someone broke their rules? If someone broke the rules of your company you will not kick his A**?

     
     
     
    @October 7, 2007 1:21 am
    shy guy Says:

    This is first time I see you in youtube..
    Sorry coz I’m a newbie…
    You like to get exposed huh?

    @October 7, 2007 10:18 am
    jim Says:

     
    @October 8, 2007 8:52 am
    ShoeMoney Says:

    I have been doing youtube stuff way before this blog ;)

     
     
    @October 7, 2007 5:43 am

    Maybe Google should have a “naughty chair” index where high ranking sites get sent to if they are suspected of naughty activities like link exchanges.

    Rather than having an “I’m feeling lucky” button, replace it with “naughty chair”. Think of the possibilities.

     
    @October 7, 2007 5:46 am
    Stefano Says:

    LOL, I guess this girl is making it look stupid as well :-). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxPocYISWJ8

     
    @October 7, 2007 6:07 am
    LeGo Says:

    very nice thoughts. there are lots of interesting aspects to google. they have to walk a thin line.

     
    @October 7, 2007 6:41 am
    Avromi Says:

    Interesting way of approaching link buys. BTW in regard to link exchanges a few weeks ago Google apparently changed the wording in the link schemes page in the webmasters section of the site to “Excessive reciprocal links or excessive link exchanging” See official wording here

     
    @October 7, 2007 6:55 am
    Derek Says:

    Hmm. I think that was just about the best boiled down, sensical explanation of the whole subject yet.. Lots of good points in there. Looking at it from that perspective, I wonder if Google really wishes they hadn’t bothered opening up this can of worms in the first place, because with the awareness of certain cases like you mentioned, they’re going to end up looking stupid one way or the other sometimes… Can’t blame them for not wanting to look stupid, no person or company does, but they’re going to end up shooting themselves in the foot from time to time if they’re not a lot more careful.

     
    @October 7, 2007 7:30 am
    Hyder Says:

    Right now it’s Google’s game, so we can either play it or be left behind. Tomorrow the whole concept of their “BackRub” aka search algorithm can change and with that so will the entire dynamics of doing business online. But even if they do decide to completely change the way they rank sites, people will still learn how to play the game.

    @October 8, 2007 4:13 pm
    Googlelady Says:

    The best way to “Play their game” is to write to your users and not trying to get higher ranks. If you have a blog just write to your readers and forget about rankings (if it is new) for awhile.

     
     
    @October 7, 2007 9:04 am
    Theo Says:

    Do Youtube subscriptions count for the bet with John Chow? ;)

    @October 8, 2007 4:14 pm
    Googlelady Says:

    Oooopss that will be hard to Mr Chow :P

    @October 13, 2007 2:36 pm

    This comment doesn’t even make any sense. It’s like you take completely random words from your head and slam them together to make spam comments. Are you a native English speaker?

     
     
     
    @October 7, 2007 9:42 am
    Collin Says:

    Interesting Video Shoe, Makes me think am I wasiteing my time trying to think of ways to increase my search engine ranks if your traffic is only 4% from there.
    Thanks for the great info!

    @October 7, 2007 5:43 pm
    Mubin Says:

    Shoe doesn’t need to depend on search engine traffic. He’s bigger than the rest of us.

    @October 8, 2007 4:15 pm
    Googlelady Says:

    everyone depends on search traffic when they first start. and 4% of his traffic is a lot believe me ;)

     
     
     
    @October 7, 2007 10:03 am

    I love the power of the Internet. I cancelled all my text link ads a while back.

     
    @October 7, 2007 10:07 am

    For the most part I agree with you. But, a couple things:
    1. I don’t think Google frowns on paid reviews. I’ve talked to a Google rep that said it’s OK.
    2. I think it’s really only the sites that are popular enough (like john Chow), that have to worry about Google getting on their back.

    @October 7, 2007 10:51 am

    most of the replies i got from Google rep are usually non-answers and open to intrepertations

     
    @October 8, 2007 4:17 pm
    Googlelady Says:

    For my point of view, Google will not care about reviews but “trying to manipulate their ranks” and that is difficult to Google knows 100% about Mr Chow is because he mentioned and if he was doing what he did slowly I am sure this will not happened. But he got tons of links every week and I mean TONS.

     
     
    @October 7, 2007 10:17 am
    jim Says:

    Guess you’re not a fan of greenbaum? :) ahaha

     
    @October 7, 2007 10:30 am
    The Dino Says:

    That is many subsribers, should be counted to the competition with John Chow.

     
    @October 7, 2007 10:50 am

    i feel google has grown so big that we have to comply or be left out

    true, don’t bite the hand that feeds you

    but people will always try beat the ’system’

     

    [...] I read this post from Make$ Money$ and watched the clip from Shoemoney, I don’t know if I should be happy about it. This blog got demoted to PR2 now, so that means [...]

     
    @October 7, 2007 10:56 am

    Google people are not all that hard to deal with as long as you get the right one, so sometimes when dealing with a google review you need to try, try again. Paid links aren’t any worse than other things, but Google does need to keep up the pretense that they are not trading links for money or favors.

     
    @October 7, 2007 11:07 am
    Joeychgo Says:

    Google is Google. The “do no evil” line is meaningless now since they are a public company. Now its “raise profits” - thats it.

     
    @October 7, 2007 11:40 am

    Google is the industry leader so the expect us mortals to follow them. The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world. What more can I say.

     
    @October 7, 2007 2:21 pm
    CatherineL Says:

    I just find the whole backlink thing so confusing. I have links from sites with decent PR etc, on some of my sites but many don’t show up on Google. And I don’t know what I’m doing wrong, but i check out some of my competitors links, and they count - even the ones from spammy link farms.

    I don’t optimise my personal blog for the search engines, at all. If I did, I wouldn’t enjoy writing, and nobody would enjoy reading it.

    Great video by the way - but it would be good if you could talk a little louder, as I struggled to hear all of it.

     
    @October 7, 2007 2:54 pm
    Archos 605 Says:

    Shoe, you must be smiling on the inside, Chow being dropped is beneficial for you in your little RSS contest ?

    @October 7, 2007 5:44 pm
    Mubin Says:

    Chow was dropped about 2 months ago mate, where you been?

     
     
    @October 7, 2007 3:24 pm

    as it is always said… he who has the money controls the game….. and right now google has the money in the online world. so they set the rules. Interesting vid.

    @October 7, 2007 5:46 pm
    Mubin Says:

    Actually your wrong there mate. Text Link Ads and Link Buyers have the money, whereas Google has the authority to nuke your site. You sell links your site gets nuked, you dont and you have a very high ranking site that is worth nothing cuz you can’t sell the links. Your post doesn’t really make much sense and I think you just wrote it cuz your were itching to use that cliche ever since you heard it around the water cooler at the office.

     
     
    @October 7, 2007 5:13 pm

    I totally agree and suffered the same fate with my “mass” site posting. I also noticed they will give you a second chance if you play there way. I went from top to bottom in an eye blink and they made me look stupid. lol .. If you mess with the big “G” you better be a chess master and in it for the long term. Tk

     
    @October 7, 2007 5:45 pm
    Justin Says:

    That was the best summation of why people get penalized in Google that I have ever heard. It’s one of those observations where once you hear it it seems so obvious.

     
    @October 7, 2007 5:52 pm
    Mubin Says:

    Shoe, first things first, you gotta do something about the quality of the comments on your posts, I think either people are just replying to get their name in the top commenter’s side bar, or they reply because they think that it will lead more traffic coming to their site. Some of the more retarded comments that I have come across.

    as it is always said… he who has the money controls the game….. and right now google has the money in the online world. so they set the rules. Interesting vid.

    That post makes no sense.

    Shoe, you must be smiling on the inside, Chow being dropped is beneficial for you in your little RSS contest ?

    This guy I guess only found out now about Mr. Chow being dropped from the rankings, when it happened about two months ago.

    Google is the industry leader so the expect us mortals to follow them. The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world. What more can I say.

    Oh great another comment that can be left open to about 10 different interpetaitons

    Sorry for all the ranting shoe.

    @October 7, 2007 6:16 pm
    dillsmack Says:

    What about your crap-tastic off-topic comment?

     
     
    @October 7, 2007 6:25 pm
    mubin Says:

    which one? give me a better forum where to rant and I wil, the reason for posting in the comments was to make sure some of the readers knew what they were doing was make them look like idiots, much like what my impression of you is now. way. to. go. idiot.

    @October 7, 2007 6:40 pm
    ShoeMoney Says:

    mubin have you seen how hard i have been trying in this rss contest? have i done anything but announce it was taken place a week ago? Have you noticed how the footer of this site has been broken for like a month?

    Im frickin busy man and this blog is about my 7th priority

    @October 8, 2007 3:26 am
    Mubin Says:

    Shoe, wasn’t ripping on you. Was trynig to hate on the commentators. I know your a busy man bro RELAX!

     
     
    @October 8, 2007 7:39 am
    LeGo Says:

    There is either a comment missing or the reply to comment was not handled properly… It makes the internet ranting hard to follow.

     
     
    @October 7, 2007 7:54 pm
    Jay S Says:

    Fantastic view on Google. Really appreciated this vid. Thanks!

     
    @October 7, 2007 7:57 pm

    Google has some major problems with their stance on paid links - namely:

    1 - They can’t possibly enforce their ban on paid links with an algorithm, as it will clearly weed out lots of valid links, undermining the whole basis for their SERP results (trust based on links).

    2 - The result of number 1 - they have to enforce these bans on an individual basis, which creates inequity in treatment. What gets site A first page SERPs gets site B thrown out of the index. Google might say that this is great, as it forces design for humans rather than search engines, but that’s not the real world. People have to be able to optimize their site to be found reliably.

    Their outrage over paid linking is a bit much for me. Shoe points out 1 of the 2 big reasons why Google takes this stance - they don’t want to be gamed, because they lose credibility. The other half of the story, I believe, is that Google knows organic SERP manipulation through link buying could cut significantly into their AdWords revenue.

     
    @October 7, 2007 8:12 pm

    That was was a long video… but very entertaining, thanks :)

     
    @October 7, 2007 8:56 pm

    I just think it’s better to try and make quality sites and services and really… not focus that much on SEO at all. I mean, apply basic elements etc etc but obsessing on it is really not a good thing, I think it’s better to obsess on viral entity, branding and quality. I get a very very small amount of search engine traffic, most are backlinks and other stuff. I just wouldn’t fuck with Google also. Why bother, you may be able to fool them for a little while, but look at their resources, money, team and all that. You put that all into account and it’s obviously only a matter of time before they figure things out, it’s a game of technical and intellectual catch up between SEO freaks and Google but fucking with them I think will ultimately lead to you getting kicked out of their engine, end of. But It’s definitely wrong that they punish John Chow and not BMW and big companies. It makes them look worse to me, if they did nothing, they would look complacent but the fact they punished… I guess, a ‘litte guy’ in comparison to BMW, it makes them look unfair, favorable of popularity and wealth and ignore their own rules for their own wealth.

     
    @October 7, 2007 9:36 pm
    Garry Conn Says:

    The John Chow story is such a prime example. Fortunately for him he can hold his own without Google…. and also even though he has been removed or manually adjusted down, what is left are thousands of bloggers posts that talk about him and provide direct links to his blog. So, all in all… its really not that huge of a loss for him.

    The video was great man… I too am breaking free a lot and worrying less about what Google thinks of my blog and more about what my readers think. Thanks for the video man.

     

    [...] Shoemoney’s video about avoiding getting hit by Google stated that the key is just don’t do things that make Google look stupid or undermine the perceived magic that occurs at Google. [...]

     

    [...] Shoemoney’s video about avoiding getting hit by Google stated that the key is just don’t do things that make Google look stupid or undermine the perceived magic that occurs at Google. [...]

     
    @October 7, 2007 10:20 pm
    Bulbboy Says:

    10,000 YT subs is a huge amount in such a short time!

    I think you should give your first subscriber a prize.

    =P

     
    @October 8, 2007 12:24 am
    lyricsreg Says:

    In order to be able to make google look stupid, you must have a high-impact website. It cannot be accomplished with a website that gets an insignificant amount of visitors. If you are at the point where you CAN make google look stupid, you should … just to prove a point :)

     
    @October 8, 2007 12:40 am

    You have some great videos on youtube! Thanks. :)

     

    [...] Shoemoney’s video about avoiding getting hit by Google stated that the key is just don’t do things that make Google look stupid or undermine the perceived magic that occurs at Google. [...]

     
    @October 8, 2007 6:25 am
    Seo Next Says:

    Google is not doing good thngs this days, even one of our site is anned , with same content other big sites are running.

     

    [...] Shoemoney has been saying "Don't Make Google Look Stupid" [...]

     
    @October 8, 2007 8:35 am

    The paid links issue really ticks me off. Google tells Webmasters that if they want to be listed in the SERPS to get similar sites to link to you. Then they ban sites that do what they suggest.

    @October 8, 2007 12:45 pm

    Damned if you and damned if you don’t, I feel your pain. Now there are rumors about non-paid link exchanges hurting ranks *sigh*

    @October 8, 2007 1:16 pm

    Google would love to get away from link pop completely. I’m sure they are researching day and night to add more social media to their algo.

     
     
     
    @October 8, 2007 10:45 pm

    [...] talking about Google this way if I know what is good for my blog. In the video, he plainly stated, Don’t Make Google Look Stupid - Period Naah… it’s not making them look stupid by talking bad about Google, rather it is making [...]

     
    @October 9, 2007 2:50 am
    John Loch Says:

    You made a few valid points, you speculated, you made a few valid points. Didn’t look all that great (you’ve done better vids :) ) but that’s life.

    In the end Google does as Google wants. Kinda like your blog. If it serves your purpose to post about xyz, you’ll do so. They have the same disclaimer as you, just a little more convoluted ;)

     
    @October 9, 2007 2:55 am

    [...] I am NOT trying to make Google look stupid. I am just trying having some fun and lift spirits of all the [...]

     
    @October 9, 2007 10:42 am

    great post. I hate the way google have that power but hey what can we do about it…

     
    @October 9, 2007 11:07 am

    all true. without the “Google” brand they don’t have much to roll on. $600 a share?

     
    @October 9, 2007 12:13 pm

    Hey - can you turn up your mike next time you put up a great video like this? Even with my speakers turned up all the way, I only caught about 75% of what you said. ;)

     
    @October 9, 2007 3:50 pm

    Interesting take on the whole paid links issue, I like how you’ve stepped back to look at the bigger picture.

     
    @October 9, 2007 11:19 pm

    RIght, and that’s why did I titled my post about the paid links debate with Google at SEJ “Reign of Bread and Whip. The New Google Aristocracy”. Don’t make the “king” look stupid, if it is your “king” or zack.. and you will be about 12 inches shorter. :)

     

    [...] ShoeMoney point out in his video post about Not Making Google look stupid he points out that less than 15% (can’t remember the exact number) of his traffic comes from [...]

     
    @October 10, 2007 8:55 pm
    max Says:

    Cool, I am subscribin’ today.

    @October 15, 2007 7:21 am
    Joeychgo Says:

    ive been a subscriber

     
     

    [...] Why I Don’t Use AdSense Forget Everything You’ve Ever Learned About Adsense  Don’t Make Google Look Stupid - Period  [...]

     

    [...] Don’t Make Google Look Stupid - Period [...]

     
     
    @October 11, 2007 11:31 am

    [...] for BMW and see no results for bmw’s website? That makes them look stupid, and according to Shoemoney, DON’T MAKE GOOGLE LOOK [...]

     
    @October 11, 2007 2:22 pm

    [...] é absolutamente brilhante (se ainda não deram conta, eu tenho uma predilecção por títulos): Don’t make Google look stupid - Period. O tema são as penalizações pela venda de links e Shoemoney aponta a principal razão para [...]

     
    @October 13, 2007 2:34 pm

    The problem is the penalties for sites that aren’t trying to make Google looks stupid, but are honestly trying to improve their rankings. Google has this ill-conceived view of the internet - they think it exists solely for the purpose of being indexed by Google and that its rankings have some inherent goodness to them. Not the case. Google needs to realize that the internet exists in large part for commerce. It’s not an evolving encyclopedia that should be advertisement free.

     
    @October 14, 2007 12:59 am

    We should not worry much. SEO will take it course

    @October 16, 2007 10:52 am

    Yup, especially with google working out new stuff for PR and paid links.

     
     

    [...] was doing my daily reading of subscribed RSS feeds when I came across this video by Shoemoney about making Google look stupid, and it really appealed to me how he touched on alot of points that made alot of sense too me. [...]

     

    [...] Chow & Co. – these are the people who are changing the way we think and approach blogging. As Shoe said, you have to play the game – up until a [...]

     

    [...] Anyways have a look at what he has to say about the fiasco. His post is also aptly titled Dont make google look stupid [...]

     
    @October 22, 2007 4:23 pm