Oct 6 2007
Jeremy Schoemaker

Don’t Make Google Look Stupid - Period

By Jeremy Schoemaker 130 comments


BTW I post a lot of videos on YouTube that I do not post on my blog. If you would like to be notified when new ones are posted you can subscribe to my youtube profile (currently over 10,000 subscribers)

  1. mike said on October 6th, 2007 at 10:06 pm

    Shoe,

    I am normally not a fan of yours but I just wanted to say this is the first post I have seen that is SOOO dead on about Google and how they operate. People get so caught up in the Google grandstanding they lose sight of what Google is… just another advertising company. Thanks for breaking it down.

    [Reply]

  2. browie said on October 6th, 2007 at 10:32 pm

    I subscribe. But you’re like 2nd or 3rd on the list… Brigitte Dale is number #1 and then you and Thor are tied at 2. I don’t watch youtube much for “subscriptions”

    [Reply]

  3. Neil Duckett said on October 6th, 2007 at 10:35 pm

    Hahaha, total Douchebag comment cracked me up!

    [Reply]

  4. Sasha Weberov said on October 6th, 2007 at 10:43 pm

    I agree, never fuck with those that have authority over you. That means the government and Google.

    [Reply]

  5. Jake said on October 6th, 2007 at 10:57 pm

    Good point. Use common sense, play the game, get search results.

    [Reply]

  6. Aditya Kumar Singh said on October 6th, 2007 at 11:18 pm

    Well Said Jeremy !

    [Reply]

  7. Craig said on October 6th, 2007 at 11:42 pm

    You say don’t make google look stupid but recently they have been making themselves look stupid. The rules are enforced to some sites, and then overlooked to others. Many authority sites break the new rules and have seen no affects, but many others have. Also, I agree that search traffic isn’t everything. There are other sites than Google, and it is nice to focus on your users and not the search engine. After all, who is actually using your site?

    [Reply]

  8. wethead said on October 7th, 2007 at 12:07 am

    Hey Shoe,

    The whole paid links thing does get weirder by the day, I will agree with that,

    I also agree with what you said about google.

    If you embarrass them, they will make you look just as dumb,

    So, Yea..I just keep telling myself,

    Make the users happy and everyone will be happy :)

    ~Joe

    [Reply]

  9. Israel said on October 7th, 2007 at 12:15 am

    hmm, makes me think you are calling attention to yourself.

    [Reply]

  10. Jeremy Luebke said on October 7th, 2007 at 12:18 am

    No words truer spoken.

    [Reply]

  11. Blog Contests said on October 7th, 2007 at 12:26 am

    10,000 subs on your YouTube profile? Dang you are doing well!

    [Reply]

  12. Word Hugger said on October 7th, 2007 at 12:55 am

    Yeah, especially since (as far as I know), it wasn’t referenced on the blog. Congrats.

    As for the post, you would think instead of completely removing a site from the index, it would just stop it from ranking for anything other than its own name.

    Anyone that Googles “john chow” has to have a reason to know his name, so I think he should rank #1 for that no matter what.

    [Reply]

  13. shy guy said on October 7th, 2007 at 1:21 am

    This is first time I see you in youtube..
    Sorry coz I’m a newbie…
    You like to get exposed huh?

    [Reply]

  14. Gary R. Hess said on October 7th, 2007 at 1:29 am

    So true. Makes you wonder if they edit one by one or do they just click a button that makes all sites terms -30 or whatever (in most cases, since Jeremy obviously was added for that one term). Of course, maybe they meant to do that in this specific case for whatever reason.

    [Reply]

  15. Brisbane SEO Guy said on October 7th, 2007 at 5:43 am

    Maybe Google should have a “naughty chair” index where high ranking sites get sent to if they are suspected of naughty activities like link exchanges.

    Rather than having an “I’m feeling lucky” button, replace it with “naughty chair”. Think of the possibilities.

    [Reply]

  16. Stefano said on October 7th, 2007 at 5:46 am

    LOL, I guess this girl is making it look stupid as well :-). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxPocYISWJ8

    [Reply]

  17. LeGo said on October 7th, 2007 at 6:07 am

    very nice thoughts. there are lots of interesting aspects to google. they have to walk a thin line.

    [Reply]

  18. Avromi said on October 7th, 2007 at 6:41 am

    Interesting way of approaching link buys. BTW in regard to link exchanges a few weeks ago Google apparently changed the wording in the link schemes page in the webmasters section of the site to “Excessive reciprocal links or excessive link exchanging” See official wording here

    [Reply]

    SEO Training Reply:

    I wonder what “excessive” means. There’s going to be a lot of link directories who give free reciprocal links mighty angry.

    [Reply]

  19. Derek said on October 7th, 2007 at 6:55 am

    Hmm. I think that was just about the best boiled down, sensical explanation of the whole subject yet.. Lots of good points in there. Looking at it from that perspective, I wonder if Google really wishes they hadn’t bothered opening up this can of worms in the first place, because with the awareness of certain cases like you mentioned, they’re going to end up looking stupid one way or the other sometimes… Can’t blame them for not wanting to look stupid, no person or company does, but they’re going to end up shooting themselves in the foot from time to time if they’re not a lot more careful.

    [Reply]

  20. Hyder said on October 7th, 2007 at 7:30 am

    Right now it’s Google’s game, so we can either play it or be left behind. Tomorrow the whole concept of their “BackRub” aka search algorithm can change and with that so will the entire dynamics of doing business online. But even if they do decide to completely change the way they rank sites, people will still learn how to play the game.

    [Reply]

  21. Theo said on October 7th, 2007 at 9:04 am

    Do Youtube subscriptions count for the bet with John Chow? ;)

    [Reply]

  22. Collin said on October 7th, 2007 at 9:42 am

    Interesting Video Shoe, Makes me think am I wasiteing my time trying to think of ways to increase my search engine ranks if your traffic is only 4% from there.
    Thanks for the great info!

    [Reply]

  23. Gecko Tales said on October 7th, 2007 at 10:03 am

    I love the power of the Internet. I cancelled all my text link ads a while back.

    [Reply]

  24. Justin Cook said on October 7th, 2007 at 10:07 am

    For the most part I agree with you. But, a couple things:
    1. I don’t think Google frowns on paid reviews. I’ve talked to a Google rep that said it’s OK.
    2. I think it’s really only the sites that are popular enough (like john Chow), that have to worry about Google getting on their back.

    [Reply]

  25. Justin Cook said on October 7th, 2007 at 10:08 am

    That doesn’t even make sense! He didn’t once mention himself, except at the end of the post with the note that this site receives only 4% se traffic…

    [Reply]

  26. jim said on October 7th, 2007 at 10:17 am

    Guess you’re not a fan of greenbaum? :) ahaha

    [Reply]

  27. jim said on October 7th, 2007 at 10:18 am

    Huh?

    [Reply]

  28. The Dino said on October 7th, 2007 at 10:30 am

    That is many subsribers, should be counted to the competition with John Chow.

    [Reply]

  29. Singapore Athletics said on October 7th, 2007 at 10:50 am

    i feel google has grown so big that we have to comply or be left out

    true, don’t bite the hand that feeds you

    but people will always try beat the ’system’

    [Reply]

  30. Singapore Athletics said on October 7th, 2007 at 10:51 am

    most of the replies i got from Google rep are usually non-answers and open to intrepertations

    [Reply]

  31. Tracy Robinson said on October 7th, 2007 at 10:56 am

    Google people are not all that hard to deal with as long as you get the right one, so sometimes when dealing with a google review you need to try, try again. Paid links aren’t any worse than other things, but Google does need to keep up the pretense that they are not trading links for money or favors.

    [Reply]

  32. Joeychgo said on October 7th, 2007 at 11:03 am

    I couldnt agree more

    [Reply]

  33. Joeychgo said on October 7th, 2007 at 11:07 am

    Google is Google. The “do no evil” line is meaningless now since they are a public company. Now its “raise profits” - thats it.

    [Reply]

  34. Compare Credit Cards said on October 7th, 2007 at 11:40 am

    Google is the industry leader so the expect us mortals to follow them. The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world. What more can I say.

    [Reply]

  35. CatherineL said on October 7th, 2007 at 2:21 pm

    I just find the whole backlink thing so confusing. I have links from sites with decent PR etc, on some of my sites but many don’t show up on Google. And I don’t know what I’m doing wrong, but i check out some of my competitors links, and they count - even the ones from spammy link farms.

    I don’t optimise my personal blog for the search engines, at all. If I did, I wouldn’t enjoy writing, and nobody would enjoy reading it.

    Great video by the way - but it would be good if you could talk a little louder, as I struggled to hear all of it.

    [Reply]

  36. Archos 605 said on October 7th, 2007 at 2:54 pm

    Shoe, you must be smiling on the inside, Chow being dropped is beneficial for you in your little RSS contest ?

    [Reply]

  37. CPA Affiliates said on October 7th, 2007 at 3:24 pm

    as it is always said… he who has the money controls the game….. and right now google has the money in the online world. so they set the rules. Interesting vid.

    [Reply]

  38. Tod Kilgore said on October 7th, 2007 at 5:13 pm

    I totally agree and suffered the same fate with my “mass” site posting. I also noticed they will give you a second chance if you play there way. I went from top to bottom in an eye blink and they made me look stupid. lol .. If you mess with the big “G” you better be a chess master and in it for the long term. Tk

    [Reply]

  39. CFernandes said on October 7th, 2007 at 5:40 pm

    I also think it is ridiculous that Text Link Ads and John Chow don´t rank #1 for there own names. For a search engine it doesn´t get any more IRRELEVANT than that!

    [Reply]

  40. Mubin said on October 7th, 2007 at 5:43 pm

    Shoe doesn’t need to depend on search engine traffic. He’s bigger than the rest of us.

    [Reply]

  41. Mubin said on October 7th, 2007 at 5:44 pm

    Chow was dropped about 2 months ago mate, where you been?

    [Reply]

  42. Justin said on October 7th, 2007 at 5:45 pm

    That was the best summation of why people get penalized in Google that I have ever heard. It’s one of those observations where once you hear it it seems so obvious.

    [Reply]

  43. Mubin said on October 7th, 2007 at 5:46 pm

    Actually your wrong there mate. Text Link Ads and Link Buyers have the money, whereas Google has the authority to nuke your site. You sell links your site gets nuked, you dont and you have a very high ranking site that is worth nothing cuz you can’t sell the links. Your post doesn’t really make much sense and I think you just wrote it cuz your were itching to use that cliche ever since you heard it around the water cooler at the office.

    [Reply]

  44. Mubin said on October 7th, 2007 at 5:52 pm

    Shoe, first things first, you gotta do something about the quality of the comments on your posts, I think either people are just replying to get their name in the top commenter’s side bar, or they reply because they think that it will lead more traffic coming to their site. Some of the more retarded comments that I have come across.

    as it is always said… he who has the money controls the game….. and right now google has the money in the online world. so they set the rules. Interesting vid.

    That post makes no sense.

    Shoe, you must be smiling on the inside, Chow being dropped is beneficial for you in your little RSS contest ?

    This guy I guess only found out now about Mr. Chow being dropped from the rankings, when it happened about two months ago.

    Google is the industry leader so the expect us mortals to follow them. The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world. What more can I say.

    Oh great another comment that can be left open to about 10 different interpetaitons

    Sorry for all the ranting shoe.

    [Reply]

  45. dillsmack said on October 7th, 2007 at 6:16 pm

    What about your crap-tastic off-topic comment?

    [Reply]

  46. mubin said on October 7th, 2007 at 6:25 pm

    which one? give me a better forum where to rant and I wil, the reason for posting in the comments was to make sure some of the readers knew what they were doing was make them look like idiots, much like what my impression of you is now. way. to. go. idiot.

    [Reply]

  47. ShoeMoney said on October 7th, 2007 at 6:40 pm

    mubin have you seen how hard i have been trying in this rss contest? have i done anything but announce it was taken place a week ago? Have you noticed how the footer of this site has been broken for like a month?

    Im frickin busy man and this blog is about my 7th priority

    [Reply]

  48. Jay S said on October 7th, 2007 at 7:54 pm

    Fantastic view on Google. Really appreciated this vid. Thanks!

    [Reply]

  49. Web Hosting Reviews said on October 7th, 2007 at 7:57 pm

    Google has some major problems with their stance on paid links - namely:

    1 - They can’t possibly enforce their ban on paid links with an algorithm, as it will clearly weed out lots of valid links, undermining the whole basis for their SERP results (trust based on links).

    2 - The result of number 1 - they have to enforce these bans on an individual basis, which creates inequity in treatment. What gets site A first page SERPs gets site B thrown out of the index. Google might say that this is great, as it forces design for humans rather than search engines, but that’s not the real world. People have to be able to optimize their site to be found reliably.

    Their outrage over paid linking is a bit much for me. Shoe points out 1 of the 2 big reasons why Google takes this stance - they don’t want to be gamed, because they lose credibility. The other half of the story, I believe, is that Google knows organic SERP manipulation through link buying could cut significantly into their AdWords revenue.

    [Reply]

  50. Clarke Internet Marketing said on October 7th, 2007 at 8:12 pm

    That was was a long video… but very entertaining, thanks :)

    [Reply]

  51. Nick Sullivan said on October 7th, 2007 at 8:56 pm

    I just think it’s better to try and make quality sites and services and really… not focus that much on SEO at all. I mean, apply basic elements etc etc but obsessing on it is really not a good thing, I think it’s better to obsess on viral entity, branding and quality. I get a very very small amount of search engine traffic, most are backlinks and other stuff. I just wouldn’t fuck with Google also. Why bother, you may be able to fool them for a little while, but look at their resources, money, team and all that. You put that all into account and it’s obviously only a matter of time before they figure things out, it’s a game of technical and intellectual catch up between SEO freaks and Google but fucking with them I think will ultimately lead to you getting kicked out of their engine, end of. But It’s definitely wrong that they punish John Chow and not BMW and big companies. It makes them look worse to me, if they did nothing, they would look complacent but the fact they punished… I guess, a ‘litte guy’ in comparison to BMW, it makes them look unfair, favorable of popularity and wealth and ignore their own rules for their own wealth.

    [Reply]

  52. Garry Conn said on October 7th, 2007 at 9:36 pm

    The John Chow story is such a prime example. Fortunately for him he can hold his own without Google…. and also even though he has been removed or manually adjusted down, what is left are thousands of bloggers posts that talk about him and provide direct links to his blog. So, all in all… its really not that huge of a loss for him.

    The video was great man… I too am breaking free a lot and worrying less about what Google thinks of my blog and more about what my readers think. Thanks for the video man.

    [Reply]

  53. Bulbboy said on October 7th, 2007 at 10:20 pm

    10,000 YT subs is a huge amount in such a short time!

    I think you should give your first subscriber a prize.

    =P

    [Reply]

  54. lyricsreg said on October 8th, 2007 at 12:24 am

    In order to be able to make google look stupid, you must have a high-impact website. It cannot be accomplished with a website that gets an insignificant amount of visitors. If you are at the point where you CAN make google look stupid, you should … just to prove a point :)

    [Reply]

  55. Jonathan Volk said on October 8th, 2007 at 12:40 am

    You have some great videos on youtube! Thanks. :)

    [Reply]

  56. Mubin said on October 8th, 2007 at 3:26 am

    Shoe, wasn’t ripping on you. Was trynig to hate on the commentators. I know your a busy man bro RELAX!

    [Reply]

  57. Seo Next said on October 8th, 2007 at 6:25 am

    Google is not doing good thngs this days, even one of our site is anned , with same content other big sites are running.

    [Reply]

  58. Seo Next said on October 8th, 2007 at 6:26 am

    Ya if we whant to make sites never try to go against google presently.

    [Reply]

  59. LeGo said on October 8th, 2007 at 7:39 am

    There is either a comment missing or the reply to comment was not handled properly… It makes the internet ranting hard to follow.

    [Reply]

  60. Gecko Tales said on October 8th, 2007 at 8:35 am

    The paid links issue really ticks me off. Google tells Webmasters that if they want to be listed in the SERPS to get similar sites to link to you. Then they ban sites that do what they suggest.

    [Reply]

  61. ShoeMoney said on October 8th, 2007 at 8:52 am

    I have been doing youtube stuff way before this blog ;)

    [Reply]

  62. Modern Worker said on October 8th, 2007 at 12:45 pm

    Damned if you and damned if you don’t, I feel your pain. Now there are rumors about non-paid link exchanges hurting ranks *sigh*

    [Reply]

  63. Gecko Tales said on October 8th, 2007 at 1:16 pm

    Google would love to get away from link pop completely. I’m sure they are researching day and night to add more social media to their algo.

    [Reply]

  64. Googlelady said on October 8th, 2007 at 4:11 pm

    But why he will be ranked well when someone broke their rules? If someone broke the rules of your company you will not kick his A**?

    [Reply]

  65. Googlelady said on October 8th, 2007 at 4:13 pm

    The best way to “Play their game” is to write to your users and not trying to get higher ranks. If you have a blog just write to your readers and forget about rankings (if it is new) for awhile.

    [Reply]

  66. Googlelady said on October 8th, 2007 at 4:14 pm

    Oooopss that will be hard to Mr Chow :P

    [Reply]

  67. Googlelady said on October 8th, 2007 at 4:15 pm

    everyone depends on search traffic when they first start. and 4% of his traffic is a lot believe me ;)

    [Reply]

  68. Googlelady said on October 8th, 2007 at 4:17 pm

    For my point of view, Google will not care about reviews but “trying to manipulate their ranks” and that is difficult to Google knows 100% about Mr Chow is because he mentioned and if he was doing what he did slowly I am sure this will not happened. But he got tons of links every week and I mean TONS.

    [Reply]

  69. Beauty Girl said on October 8th, 2007 at 11:50 pm

    People have started thinking of google as god .. the sole reason of this being their kind of monopoly in the internet arena.
    Let us find a way to break this monopoly and make internet better for us.

    [Reply]

  70. John Loch said on October 9th, 2007 at 2:50 am

    You made a few valid points, you speculated, you made a few valid points. Didn’t look all that great (you’ve done better vids :) ) but that’s life.

    In the end Google does as Google wants. Kinda like your blog. If it serves your purpose to post about xyz, you’ll do so. They have the same disclaimer as you, just a little more convoluted ;)

    [Reply]

  71. Marc Eilbeck said on October 9th, 2007 at 10:42 am

    great post. I hate the way google have that power but hey what can we do about it…

    [Reply]

  72. Ryan Trembath said on October 9th, 2007 at 11:07 am

    all true. without the “Google” brand they don’t have much to roll on. $600 a share?

    [Reply]

  73. Wendy Piersall said on October 9th, 2007 at 12:13 pm

    Hey - can you turn up your mike next time you put up a great video like this? Even with my speakers turned up all the way, I only caught about 75% of what you said. ;)

    [Reply]

  74. Conversion Matters said on October 9th, 2007 at 3:50 pm

    Interesting take on the whole paid links issue, I like how you’ve stepped back to look at the bigger picture.

    [Reply]

  75. Carsten Cumbrowski said on October 9th, 2007 at 11:19 pm

    RIght, and that’s why did I titled my post about the paid links debate with Google at SEJ “Reign of Bread and Whip. The New Google Aristocracy”. Don’t make the “king” look stupid, if it is your “king” or zack.. and you will be about 12 inches shorter. :)

    [Reply]

  76. max said on October 10th, 2007 at 8:55 pm

    Cool, I am subscribin’ today.

    [Reply]

  77. bobby9101 said on October 11th, 2007 at 11:15 am

    It’s all right here: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=510644#post4795197

    [Reply]

  78. MR Butts said on October 12th, 2007 at 7:36 pm

    Google is a joke… and matt cutts an even bigger one to think he and google will be stopping anything any time soon. Build backlinks and reach the top of googles great ego…. sorry ALGO

    [Reply]

  79. Web Hosting Reviews said on October 13th, 2007 at 2:34 pm

    The problem is the penalties for sites that aren’t trying to make Google looks stupid, but are honestly trying to improve their rankings. Google has this ill-conceived view of the internet - they think it exists solely for the purpose of being indexed by Google and that its rankings have some inherent goodness to them. Not the case. Google needs to realize that the internet exists in large part for commerce. It’s not an evolving encyclopedia that should be advertisement free.

    [Reply]

  80. Web Hosting Reviews said on October 13th, 2007 at 2:36 pm

    This comment doesn’t even make any sense. It’s like you take completely random words from your head and slam them together to make spam comments. Are you a native English speaker?

    [Reply]

  81. Vickywebworld said on October 14th, 2007 at 12:59 am

    We should not worry much. SEO will take it course

    [Reply]

  82. Joeychgo said on October 15th, 2007 at 7:21 am

    ive been a subscriber

    [Reply]

  83. Instant Community said on October 16th, 2007 at 10:52 am

    Yup, especially with google working out new stuff for PR and paid links.

    [Reply]

  84. Hasan said on October 23rd, 2007 at 1:06 am

    I love you for that one! Muah

    [Reply]

  85. uttoransen said on October 30th, 2007 at 12:20 am

    you know what, my spellings are bad! when i need to go to MR craw’s page! i type in jhon more often, and ends up reaching nowhere! so for most sites i usually go to google and type in and search and reach the sites!

    But now since google was not taking me to john craw’s site so i used yahoo, and reached that site! now, for a lot of sites i use yahoo.com to search. i mean i always type textlinkads, instead of text-link-ads, i can’t make bookmarks for all the sites!

    So, at the end of the day, google will sure lose, if they keep nuking the big guys!

    [Reply]

  86. Labrocca said on November 9th, 2007 at 1:34 am

    Personally I think all these responses are just kissing your arse. I think you come off as just guessing and there isn’t much you really know. “don’t make google look dumb”…boy that’s not obscure!

    [Reply]

  87. BloggingForBillions.com said on February 21st, 2008 at 8:29 pm

    I am very new to blogging and while I do want to be ranked well with Google I am with you that I am creating content for readers and not just for search. For me it goes back to what you say about being passionate for what you do.

    [Reply]

  88. Beauty Diva said on February 29th, 2008 at 12:06 am

    very nice thoughts. there are lots of interesting aspects to google.

    [Reply]

  89. Chip said on March 13th, 2008 at 3:25 am

    I’m looking forward to the day you will be able to advertise and monetize your YouTube account. Richness will come in waves.

    [Reply]

  90. Nate Hill said on April 13th, 2008 at 9:13 pm

    Looks good if there is more of that to come im subscribing!

    [Reply]

  91. Web Marketeer said on April 14th, 2008 at 3:09 am

    Big Bad Google seems to be following the same path as Microsoft. The honeymoon period is over and more and more individuals are starting to be concerned about their overwhelming monopoly of the search market and their bully-boy tactics in enforcing their
    agenda. No wonder so many of their whizz kids are leaving to go play with Facebook, inter alia.

    [Reply]

  92. Gotta get that Money! said on April 14th, 2008 at 8:05 pm

    Great to know that you are on you tube, never thought to check.

    [Reply]

  93. Frank Richard said on September 19th, 2008 at 7:23 am

    Thanks for your interesting video, Google is clever anyway coz they have so many wonderful engineers.

    [Reply]

  94. google » Don’t Make Google Look Stupid - Period said on October 6th, 2007 at 10:39 pm

    [...] å?­å??彩.é¦?港å?­&aring… wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptBTW I post a lot of videos on YouTube that I do not post on my blog. If you would like to be notifie [...]

  95. google » Don’t Make Google Look Stupid - Period said on October 6th, 2007 at 10:41 pm

    [...] Leigh wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptBTW I post a lot of videos on YouTube that I do not post on my blog. If you would like to be notified when new ones are posted you can subscribe to my youtube profile (currently over 10000 subscribers) [...]

  96. [...] I read this post from Make$ Money$ and watched the clip from Shoemoney, I don’t know if I should be happy about it. This blog got demoted to PR2 now, so that means [...]

  97. [...] Shoemoney’s video about avoiding getting hit by Google stated that the key is just don’t do things that make Google look stupid or undermine the perceived magic that occurs at Google. [...]

  98. [...] Shoemoney’s video about avoiding getting hit by Google stated that the key is just don’t do things that make Google look stupid or undermine the perceived magic that occurs at Google. [...]

  99. [...] Shoemoney’s video about avoiding getting hit by Google stated that the key is just don’t do things that make Google look stupid or undermine the perceived magic that occurs at Google. [...]

  100. [...] Shoemoney has been saying "Don't Make Google Look Stupid" [...]

  101. The Page Rank Fiasco. | Blog Gigs said on October 8th, 2007 at 10:45 pm

    [...] talking about Google this way if I know what is good for my blog. In the video, he plainly stated, Don’t Make Google Look Stupid - Period Naah… it’s not making them look stupid by talking bad about Google, rather it is making [...]

  102. The Top Ten Google Keyword Blunders said on October 9th, 2007 at 2:55 am

    [...] I am NOT trying to make Google look stupid. I am just trying having some fun and lift spirits of all the [...]

  103. Putting to much stock in Google? | Success for your Blog said on October 10th, 2007 at 8:22 am

    [...] ShoeMoney point out in his video post about Not Making Google look stupid he points out that less than 15% (can’t remember the exact number) of his traffic comes from [...]

  104. Google AdSense In A Nutshell « Ioncenter’s Weblog said on October 11th, 2007 at 2:23 am

    [...] Why I Don’t Use AdSense Forget Everything You’ve Ever Learned About Adsense  Don’t Make Google Look Stupid - Period  [...]

  105. SiteMost’s Weekly Blog Recap 11/10/07 at Brisbane SEO Blog said on October 11th, 2007 at 7:41 am

    [...] Don’t Make Google Look Stupid - Period [...]

  106. Danny Sullivan - Build A Search Engine - PLEASE said on October 11th, 2007 at 11:31 am

    [...] for BMW and see no results for bmw’s website? That makes them look stupid, and according to Shoemoney, DON’T MAKE GOOGLE LOOK [...]

  107. Spam no Google News - Marketing de Busca said on October 11th, 2007 at 2:22 pm

    [...] é absolutamente brilhante (se ainda não deram conta, eu tenho uma predilecção por títulos): Don’t make Google look stupid - Period. O tema são as penalizações pela venda de links e Shoemoney aponta a principal razão para [...]

  108. [...] was doing my daily reading of subscribed RSS feeds when I came across this video by Shoemoney about making Google look stupid, and it really appealed to me how he touched on alot of points that made alot of sense too me. [...]

  109. [...] Chow & Co. – these are the people who are changing the way we think and approach blogging. As Shoe said, you have to play the game – up until a [...]

  110. [...] Anyways have a look at what he has to say about the fiasco. His post is also aptly titled Dont make google look stupid [...]

  111. [...] Policy for Paid Links Today i came across with this interesting post by ShoeMoney Don’t Make Google Look Stupid - Period - ShoeMoney® He got 10,000+ subscribers on his YourTube profile already. What do you think about that post and [...]

  112. [...] Shoemoney’s video about avoiding getting hit by Google stated that the key is just don’t do things that make Google look stupid or undermine the perceived magic that occurs at Google. [...]

  113. [...] now, others, like myself, believe Google will come up with some totally new concept. Jeremy said, that when linking to others, the important part is, “not to make Google look [...]

  114. [...] Mark Kleiman wrote an interesting post today!.Here’s a quick excerptBTW I post a lot of videos on YouTube that I do not post on my blog. If you would like to be notified when new ones are posted you can subscribe to my youtube profile (currently over 10000 subscribers) [...]

  115. [...] Kiss up to Google and never tell them they are stupid. [...]

  116. ” google, episode 2 - the return of pr knight said on October 28th, 2007 at 7:08 pm

    [...] Google is a serch engine, an advertising company (read monopoly) or just another ass to be kissed ? [...]

  117. Google Fiasco is a Sign of Things to Come said on October 29th, 2007 at 3:33 am

    [...] Don’t Make Google Look Stupid - Period - Humorous banter about the entire motive of Google in this fiasco and what needs to be done. [...]

  118. [...] like the way Shoemoney describes it in his videocast __________________ Keywords Directory | Directory Templates and [...]

  119. [...] like the way Shoemoney describes it in his videocast __________________ Keywords Directory | Directory Templates and Resources | World Web [...]

  120. Top Five Posts of the Week | Million Dollars Journey Dot Com said on November 1st, 2007 at 1:47 pm

    [...] Don’t Make Google Look Stupid - Period by Shoemoney [...]

  121. [...] much for Shoemoney’s theory that we shouldn’t do anything to make Google look stupid. They seem to be doing a fine job of that all by themselves. Share the Love… and the Traffic ;) [...]

  122. [...] Google Going After PayPerPost and watch this video by ShoeMoney that is properly titled “Don’t Make Google Look Stupid - Period.” Share : These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and [...]

  123. [...] I still rather prefer reading blogs in general, but there are exceptions, particularly the one at shoemoney bringing the point home about paid links in general is about not making Google look [...]

  124. Making Google look stupid said on January 8th, 2008 at 11:27 am

    [...] Shoemoney and Aaron Wall have published interesting posts over the weekend about why you shouldn’t make [...]

  125. [...] Make Google Look Stupid - Period - Article Discussion Don’t Make Google Look Stupid - Period - ShoeMoney® Here is an article from ShoeMoney® - Skills To Pay The Bills - By Jeremy Schoemaker Good [...]

  126. Google in the ovulation period said on March 1st, 2008 at 4:11 am

    [...] What do you think is going on? I think Google is in its ovulation period, and it will get angry if you do anything that is against their terms, so basically don’t make Google Look stupid. [...]

  127. Watching the SEO House Fall Down Slowly - ShoeMoney® said on May 27th, 2008 at 11:30 am

    [...] really have nothing to add that I have not said in the past. Don’t make Google Look stupid. The are a publicly traded company and they will do what is in their best business interest. Like [...]

  128. Jeremy Shoemaker on Google…You Go Boy! » : AddyOop said on May 28th, 2008 at 11:35 am

    [...] Watch and listen to Jeremy’s video and form your own opinion of the 800 pound gorilla called Google. [...]

  129. [...] often advises people that the way to succeed in Google is to not make Google look stupid.  They want to provide searchers with the “right” answers to the queries they make.  [...]

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.