David Pogue Is Another Dumbshit Tech Writer

by Jeremy Schoemaker on September 13, 2007 · 64 comments

Today David Pogue wrote a piece in his Free column in the NYtimes titled : A Baffling New Phenomenon: Customized Ringtones.

You know… cause CUSTOMIZED ringtones have only been in existence since the iPhone came out and thats why its a NEW PHENOMENA! Are you kidding me?

OK first let me address why customized ringtones are hot (welcome to 3 years ago):

Basic human nature. How stupid would you be if you said “I dont understand why people want to paint there house different colors. The price of paint is expensive!” Ya, because to me thats how stupid you sound. People have custom ringtones because they want to personalize there phone. Sure you may not understand it but its just human nature to want to make things your own. It happens more with youth… with things like cool rims on putting stickers on your laptop… or hell painting your shoes… whatever. We are all forced to conform to using the same things so personalizing them in some way is just human nature.

Next I want to address something else you said.

Now, I realize that it’s easy to get ringtones onto your phone (or iPhone) for free, using unauthorized techniques of varying degrees of difficulty. Thousands of people do ringtones that way, but I’m not even going there.

WTF you talking about willis? If I play the guitar and sing and transfer that to my phone via bluetooth how is that an “unauthorized method” ???. If I know how to make my own ringtones from my own music (that I paid for) and I upload them to my phone how is that an “unauthorized method” ???

Lastly you talk about the ringtone industry like its just totally lining the pockets of fatcat executives (which I agree with) YET you fail to promote and of the ways in which you can make your own ringtones or send free ringtones to your phone.

So you wrote the book on the iPhone and MacOSX….. Good for you. But I think you look pretty stupid in this article.

About the author...

– who has written 2415 posts on ShoeMoney.com.

Hi I am Jeremy Schoemaker and ShoeMoney.com is my blog. 99% of the post here are done by me but you will see others occasionally make guest posts. This blog is fun to write but for my day job I run several online companies.

Images provided by ShutterStock


Mark recommends you read these posts also:

  1. iStock_000006091595XSmall How To Get People To Promote Your Stuff
  2. shutterstock_67747240 Don’t Worry – People Know
  3. reject-stamp 10 Tips for Freelance Writers Applying for Blogging Jobs

{ 64 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Frank September 13, 2007 at 4:44 pm

Writing seems to be easier then thinking these days.

Reply

2 Jack Sprinkauer September 10, 2010 at 6:58 am

Yes, Pogue has been annoying the hell out of me ever since his days as a technoignoramus for macworld magazine. Really irritated me seeing his ignorant drivel in that magazine, how the hell did he get promoted to the NY times? He doesnt know a damn thing about technology and gets by writing articles that my mom (who is technically illiterate) could write.

I guess having knowledge of technical things and something informed and useful to say is not in any way a criteria for evaluating people for getting hired as tech writers. The guy is a total bozo.

Reply

3 Nick Sullivan September 13, 2007 at 4:53 pm

Nice rant Shoe lol. I’m not in the ringtone market at all so I wont comment too much on them but good points. Obviously if you can make your own ringtones… I can’t see how that’s unauthorized.

On the subject of people writing high profile articles on things they don’t wholeheardetly know about, that annoys me to. When somebody writes on something I know alot about and get blatent things wrong yet ignorantly rant about it. It’s like how do they even get where they are.

Reply

4 Word Hugger September 13, 2007 at 4:56 pm

“painting your shoes”

People do that? lol. Nice hate post, now he can feel your wrath when this article ranks for his name.

Reply

5 Eric September 13, 2007 at 5:01 pm

Writing seems to be easier then thinking these days.

David Pogue is a terrible thinker and a good writer, whereas Shoemoney is a good thinker and a terrible writer.

Reply

6 Tom Wilson September 13, 2007 at 5:08 pm

A million monkey’s with a million type writers ….. thats pretty the definition of the Internet now. I too have seen people with painted shoes, painted back packs are the best though either way fire hazard !

P.S. shoe the top link is broke ;) although this could be intentional

Reply

7 Nick Sullivan September 13, 2007 at 5:17 pm

whereas Shoemoney is a good thinker and a terrible writer

True lol. Grammar doesn’t count for much for me though in terms of real intelligence, I hate bookworms and grammar bullies who pick you up on every little grammar mistake as if they’re a genius.

Reply

8 Fat Loser September 13, 2007 at 5:17 pm

Hey, SHOE.
sorry to post this in here off topic and all, but I thought maybe you’d see it.
i just sent you a message via your contact form on this blog, regarding another post “fast fingers = fast money”… came across some stuff you might be interested in… check that email.

Reply

9 ritchie September 13, 2007 at 5:17 pm

I agree with you… cus ringtones have been here for a while.

But now for stg completely different – why don’t you make the upper left corner logo clickable? I tricks me every time :-)

Reply

10 Nick Sullivan September 13, 2007 at 5:19 pm

It’s probably not clickable because the logo is the shoemoney writing and the big S as 1 image so it would be clickable right near the ad and the nav aswell. Should slice the image up, make it two.

Reply

11 jim September 13, 2007 at 5:30 pm

Some people just think within their little framework of the world and just can’t seem to step outside of that…

Reply

12 Modern Worker September 13, 2007 at 5:36 pm

Add Pogue to the ever-growing list of people who have no idea about what they’re saying

Reply

13 Eric September 13, 2007 at 5:40 pm

For what it’s worth, my earlier comment wasn’t intended as an insult. I’d rather be successful than a good writer.

Reply

14 Modern Worker September 13, 2007 at 5:43 pm

or lay a clear gif over top =)

Reply

15 CatherineL September 13, 2007 at 5:55 pm

I’ve never really got into ring tones. If my phone did anything but the normal ring, I’d never hear it.

Got to agree with you on the writer though, I would never work for the New York Times – rubbishy paper. And they let any idiot write for them. You don’t need a scrap of talent at all.

And it’s true, writers don’t think anyway – that’s why barely any newspapers are sold.

Reply

16 Big Dan September 13, 2007 at 6:19 pm

Welcome popular media. The writers with the largest audiences tend to get things wrong an invoke fear in regular Joe smoe’s for no good reason. :eek:

Reply

17 Jason September 13, 2007 at 6:25 pm

I agree. It’s pretentious to think that only 14 year olds only use ringtones or want custom tones on their cellphone. Sure, I’d like to have custom tones on my phone but considering my phone sits on vibrate most of the day I’m going to wait until someone make a vibe-tone in my pocket!

It seems he’s completely off-base when it comes to the usefulness of ringtones but he may be close to the mark where the cost can be so prohibitive. Apple IS cheaper than some of the alternatives. But still, they didn’t invent the ringtone.

Reply

18 Jeremy Steele September 13, 2007 at 6:34 pm

While quite amusing at times, Pogue is simply a tech writer. I tend to think tech writers are techies who weren’t quite geeky enough to make it elsewhere.

With that said, I’m too cheap for a good phone and I’m could care less what the ringtone is. I’m a horrible consumer when it comes to buying little gadgets.

By the way, CatherineL, you must have the exact same subscribed feeds list as me, seems like I’m seeing you everywhere :P

Reply

19 Nathan September 13, 2007 at 6:36 pm

I agree, looks like a stupid article he made just to try and get printed.

Reply

20 Nathan Hannig September 13, 2007 at 6:37 pm

Great counter points Shoemney. I also use custome ringtones because the parts of the songs I want aren’t available to buy at online stores.

Reply

21 Gary R. Hess September 13, 2007 at 7:02 pm

Jesus that guy is a douche.

Reply

22 Joeychgo September 13, 2007 at 7:27 pm

Yeah he is.

Reply

23 david Pogue September 13, 2007 at 8:13 pm

Dudes, dudes–you are being WAY TOO HARSH here.

The gist of this post is, “Pogue is an idiot because he refers to the ringtone phenomenon as NEW in the headline.”

OK, well, guess what? I don’t write the headlines. I NEVER referred to this phenomenon as new. In fact, I actually referred to the ANNUAL sales of ringtones, so OBVIOUSLY I know it’s not new.

If I could change the stupid headline, I would.

As for my reference to hacker tools that let you get ringtones for free: The entire column was in reference to a single subject, which I identified up front:

COMMERCIAL POP SONGS.

Not songs you write yourself. Not MP3 files or MIDI files. COMMERCIAL POP SONGS.

All 4 major carriers require you to buy them for $2.50 to $3. (And yes, I realize that there are a handful of smartphones that let you use any MP3 files you want. That’s great, but they’re the exception.)

And if you think that $3 for 20 seconds is a reasonable price… well, then I don’t think I’m the idiot! :)

–Pogue

Reply

24 Israel September 13, 2007 at 8:40 pm

i would like to see him respond here.

Reply

25 Tracy September 13, 2007 at 9:16 pm

Hey, maybe he can write next about Britney Spears, Lindsay Lohan, and Paris Hilton and about what a baffling new phenomenon it is that they’re so popular, I still can’t figure that one out.

Reply

26 King Jacob September 13, 2007 at 10:49 pm

I like the NY times but having a tech writer that openly admits to knowing less about tech than a 14 year old does not bode well.

Reply

27 bunni September 13, 2007 at 11:00 pm

Now send some link juice to this post so it ranks for his name. :D

Reply

28 King Jacob September 13, 2007 at 11:00 pm

Your article itself isnt bad but the headline doesnt fit the article. It should have been something like “A baffling new phenomena: Apple only takes an arm for custom ringtones instead of and arm and a leg” though thats kinda long.

Also there are ways to get any song, genre doesnt matter, onto a phone as a ringtone though Id think it would be a bit too complicated for a times article.

Reply

29 Scott September 13, 2007 at 11:12 pm

I actually like Pogue, he usually aims his tech coverage at a very green/newbie audience and it does look like he missed the mark here. He wrote a great book on Windows Vista though and he knows that OS inside and out – very thorough there, so I’m surprised at this.

Reply

30 Travel Notebook September 13, 2007 at 11:13 pm

Do you have an iphone shoe? You cant just take clips and make them as ringtones (easily) because Apple wants you to buy their ringtones. that is why people use “unauthorized methods”

But yeah, this guy is a total moron

Reply

31 Travel Notebook September 13, 2007 at 11:14 pm

I guess everyone reads shoemoney these days

Reply

32 Billy September 14, 2007 at 12:09 am

Holy shit, can you make anyone more stupid because they were addressing a less technical audience in their writing? Nice linking to Nextpimp though. :)

Reply

33 Click Input September 14, 2007 at 12:25 am

I read things like this all the time in local papers…. writers who don’t know jack!

Reply

34 Click Input September 14, 2007 at 12:27 am

You need to have words with your editor then.

Reply

35 lyricsreg September 14, 2007 at 12:39 am

Don’t tell anonymous to buy stuff. You should know better.

Reply

36 Gary R. Hess September 14, 2007 at 12:54 am

It’s great that you responded to this, I think I speak for everyone when saying thanks for clearing things up.

Reply

37 Dave Starr --- ROI Guy September 14, 2007 at 1:58 am

It’s really kind of funny in a not funny way how big name media chooses their clueless technical columnists. I’m old so I don’t care much about custome ring tones … but I get so p*ssed ata some idiot telling me what i can’t do that I might download a couple andstall them later just out of spite.

i aslo find it so humorous that he thinks this is new .. or, with apologoes, even when Shoe thinks ring tones are new … the ring tone craze was sweeping digitally developed countries like Japan 6 years ago, not the three years ago that the US finally woke up to the fact the cell phone system was analog antiquated and the rest of the world had passed the US by.

I guess Pogue is lucky his daddy didn’t spell it Pouge … any infantryman can tell you how worthless a Pogue is LoL

Reply

38 Seo Next September 14, 2007 at 2:41 am

That NY times Article is really crap and too long.This editors simply write anything what they like we need not read or care about them.

Reply

39 johnny boy September 14, 2007 at 3:51 am

Is the USA behind the UK by about 5 years? My phone can record anything and play it as a ringtone, and the phone cost £20 from Tesco, that’s $40 folks. You just press record, hold it near the radio, and you’ve got any tune you like on there. And its only a Sagem.

Reply

40 James September 14, 2007 at 4:02 am

Is anybody going to be suing MS for providing these hacking tools for making ringtones in unauthorized techniques? I wrote an article for the absolute newbie on how to create ringtones with Windows Movie Maker. (No link though, because my comments always seem to be marked as spam).

As Mr. Notebook says, sometimes you don’t want the section of the song that they’re selling as your ringtone, so you need to make your own…

Reply

41 Aditya Kumar Singh September 14, 2007 at 4:12 am

They are better known as graduates from the school of Google Journalism. Just make google searches and write a article without understanding the reality or the impact it will have on people. The world has a shortage of good quality technical writers. Most of them are idiots .

Reply

42 Theo September 14, 2007 at 4:22 am

This guy is a moron

Reply

43 Quinton Figueroa September 14, 2007 at 6:04 am

First it was a full blog post, next it was a subtle, link plug. I have to ask… what is your involvement with this milliondollarwiki? ;)

Reply

44 Gecko Tales September 14, 2007 at 7:01 am

Man, you slammed that cat. I love the Internet. You probably have more readers than him. Great post!

Reply

45 Teddy September 14, 2007 at 7:15 am

I think you and shoe missed david’s point. “Unauthorized methods” means methods not generally endorsed by your carrier, which expects you to pay it if you want to add a ringtone to your phone. He wasn’t talking about the source of the music (illegal downloads or you playing your guitar), he was talking about the methods for putting them onto your phone.

Shoe do you think it is ridiculous that a lot of phone companies charge you $2.50 to rent a 30 second piece of a song for 90 days? I think david had a good point there.

Reply

46 Teddy September 14, 2007 at 7:19 am

I doubt thats really him.

Reply

47 FAour September 14, 2007 at 8:47 am

I agree with Pogue about how ridiculous the price of ring tones are, but let’s not forget that that different people have different priorities. So while it might sound stupid to me, it might sound great for others.
I just truly believe that this world has become a superficial world; I think there are more comments on this subject than on important issues out there.
WAKE UP PEOPLE!

Reply

48 paymebig September 14, 2007 at 10:38 am

I went to the recomended ring tone site, I couldn’t download a free ringtone.

Reply

49 FAour September 14, 2007 at 11:34 am

Lol i wont be shocked if north america is this far behind…

Reply

50 corey September 14, 2007 at 2:09 pm

perfect timing

Reply

51 Joel Mueller September 14, 2007 at 2:15 pm

I wonder if music licensing to the consumer is going to change. If they will be legally restricted to “methods of use” for a song they purchase.

My perspective on Apple charging for the ringtone is essentially paying for the service and easy accessibility of the iTunes songs. You aren’t necessarily paying for the ringtone itself, but for the conversion and implementation. And then they cosy up to the music industry execs and share that revenue, making more deals.

And Apple probably has much higher margins on ringtone sales for music already purchased.

All very interesting though. I understand why Shoe would make these observations based on past ringtone legalities. But I wonder if those legalities aren’t changing. Pogue’s thoughts seem nieve — like someone that only just started to explore the ringtone industry through iTunes first, assuming that Apple’s methods and charging are de facto standard. OR he has an inside track on the industry and legalities of how it WILL be very soon. Not how it was in the recent past.

Reply

52 Grivon September 14, 2007 at 5:34 pm

Agreed – but do you not think he was maybe just being paid to promote the iphone!?

Reply

53 Grivon September 14, 2007 at 5:36 pm

Hahaha – he could just take his name out of the article and make it look like a googlebomb.. whatever that is?!

Reply

54 Glenn -- Write for Blogs September 14, 2007 at 5:45 pm

Pogue covers a lot of territory and does a great job bringing fairly complicated tech info to a general audience. He’s also a nice guy.

Calling him a dumbshit is dumb shit.

Having no interest in ringtones cheap, expensive or homemade, I can’t comment on this story, though.

Reply

55 Jonathan Volk September 14, 2007 at 6:46 pm

Hahaha. You totally ripped this guy to shreds.

Good stuff.

Reply

56 Bulbboy September 14, 2007 at 11:16 pm

I still can’t figure that one out.

I guess you missed the comment above stating that Pogue didn’t write the headline.
Editors who know less that reporters do that.

Reply

57 Bulbboy September 14, 2007 at 11:35 pm

Surely if you read the full million dollar wiki post, you’d know what Shoe’s involvement is?

Reply

58 King Jacob September 15, 2007 at 12:51 am

look at the comment above you;)

Reply

59 Seo Next September 15, 2007 at 6:00 am

Ya true actually writing articles on britney/paris is better option.We can simply say snoop latest hot news and write what we like.This editor who wrote bood books later might have made some celebrity blog.

Reply

60 Seo Next September 15, 2007 at 6:02 am

wow cool, i like to have such mobile phone, is that possible to use in India?.I heard many such tools are there but inbuilt is always good.

Reply

61 Instant Community September 17, 2007 at 7:12 am

Haha i totally agree with that. You got him owned.

Reply

62 stupid 3gp September 17, 2007 at 11:31 am

completely agree with you.

Reply

63 Jon September 20, 2007 at 1:59 pm

I wrote a quick guide on how to make your own ringtones from songs you already have. Why pay $3?

Reply

64 Daisy Burtle July 9, 2010 at 12:32 pm

I really liked TMZs coverage of Lindsay Lohan in court yesterday. She was having a complete meltdown!

I almost felt badly for her.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: