Dmoz Extortion

 

by Jeremy Schoemaker on August 26, 2007 · 417 comments

A while back I got a email from a guy claiming to be a DMOZ editor saying that I had to pay him $5,000.00 or he would have my site: shoemoney.com removed from the dmoz.

I thought nothing of it…. then today I got a email from him saying it was removed and I might want to rethink not paying him. I thought I would check just for grins.

It was removed… WOW

dmoz… corrupt… no…..

I never thought I would say this but I don’t even care anymore. I am stunned Google still uses this as there business directory as its the most corrupt “editorial” system EVER and especially since now they are trying to talk about paid links and crap…

Seriously I would love to see how they defend this one… How does shoemoney.com NOT belong in DMOZ??

Google seriously its time for you to aquire a business directory that has paid inclusion. There is so much porn and spam in the dmoz its a huge black eye for you. Business.com just got scooped up but there is another one that might be able to get got for a nice price *cough* best of the web *cough*

DUMP DMOZ

EDIT: A lot of people have been asking the category shoemoney.com was in. It was :

http://www.dmoz.org/Computers/Internet/Web_Design_and_Development/Authoring/

Webmaster_Resources/Affiliate_Programs/Weblogs/


Also you can see from this web archive page that it was in (last link)

So for those dmoz lovers who said I was never in… there you go

About the author...

– who has written 2472 posts on ShoeMoney.com.

Hi I am Jeremy Schoemaker and ShoeMoney.com is my blog. 99% of the post here are done by me but you will see others occasionally make guest posts. This blog is fun to write but for my day job I run several online companies.

Images provided by bigstock


Jason recommends you check out these amazing posts:

  1. Shoemoney Featured Post How to out your competitors and frenemies for spamming Google
  2. Twitter___Jeremy_Schoemaker__The_Bluelight_Specials_are_...-20090725-175527 How Do I Make Money with Twitter? – Past, Present & Future
  3. bad idea My Top 10 Worst Ideas To Make Money

{ 271 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Doyle Lewis August 26, 2007 at 3:33 am

Damn that’s shady. They really do have about the worst editorial system in the world.

Reply

2 Content Creation Service June 10, 2009 at 10:34 am

You are absolutely right.
I personally tried dozens of my sites to get approved and all were not accepted.

Shame:(

Reply

3 G August 26, 2007 at 3:40 am

man dmoz pulled the SAME THING on me but the price was only 50$ I paid it.

Reply

4 StevenH November 30, 2009 at 3:22 pm

And because you and others are willing to pay it, they’ll remain shady. As soon as the extorsion goes dry they’ll change the way they do business… but until then?

Reply

5 Vlad August 26, 2007 at 3:42 am

DMOZ is overrated these days in my opinion. I’ve always done well without it and so have many others. Fuck the corrupt swine if they want to extort you.

Reply

6 John August 26, 2007 at 3:47 am

Send him a mail asking for $5000 or else you’ll publish his email ;-)

Reply

7 RW February 11, 2009 at 1:48 am

I like it flip it back on him… Nice!

Reply

8 Bill August 26, 2007 at 3:54 am

Hahaha! Good idea.

Seriously though, I agree. Google needs to dump DMOZ and lets move on. And whats the deal with the pagerank?

Reply

9 Brewster August 26, 2007 at 3:57 am

I didn’t realise that your blog was in there – wasnt there issue with one particular editor not wanting it in there a while ago ?

Reply

10 Mark August 26, 2007 at 4:30 am

DMOZ is corrupt and the data which google uses also not accurate. It is high time google must have its own directoy.

Reply

11 Nick Sullivan August 26, 2007 at 4:36 am

People always claim it’s near impossible to get accepted now but my site got in there and my friend has like 10 in there.

I think with people like that DMOZ will become more n more corrupt n lose it’s cult status, therefore making acceptance in there lose importance.

To be honest I never saw why it was a big deal anyway, there is no need for DMOZ.

N Shoemoney I don’t see why you need it man, traffic, value? what value does a listing have for shoemoney.com, you already have 10,000 subscribers + and people always visit. You have a great design and good posts, forget DMOZ. $5,000 HA!

Reply

12 Matt Jones August 26, 2007 at 4:43 am

Why don’t you reveal who this person was and get him dumped from the editorial team

Reply

13 Kieran August 26, 2007 at 4:46 am

Although the stock of DMOZ has probably dropped like 90% over the last 5 years, paid inclusion directories don’t seem like the answer to me because so many webmasters will not sign up.

I think a possible answer would be a Directory with a Social Component involved where people can either click a ‘spam’ button or do a Digg-style thumbs up/down thing.

You can see the effect of this by looking at Craigslist. Five years ago they were very lenient on spam but are now cracking down. If they hadn’t done this CL would have been 75% affiliate links and webmaster spam.

Reply

14 Starboykb August 26, 2007 at 4:55 am

DMOZ? what the heck is that?

Reply

15 Theo August 26, 2007 at 5:00 am

I read somewhere that the gambling and porn sections in DMOZ are controlled by organized crime.

Reply

16 Bill August 26, 2007 at 5:03 am

If you were in the DMOZ, what category would you be under? Certainly not anything related to making money online, since all you seem to post about these days is off-topic junk.

Reply

17 Vlad August 26, 2007 at 5:07 am

Haha yeah good idea.

Reply

18 Scorpiono August 26, 2007 at 5:14 am

I’m shocked, can’t you just make his email public to DMOZ staff or present this, I’d really like that ****** nailed!

Reply

19 Click Input August 26, 2007 at 5:54 am

Haha, that’s a good one!

And this is really shocking!

Reply

20 Keith Donegan August 26, 2007 at 6:34 am

Yeah, I have cared less and less for the Dmoz. Shoe, post his email and get him kicked out, that is absolutely shocking to say the least.

Reply

21 Kanute August 26, 2007 at 7:28 am

Well this is bad news. I tried to get into Dmoz just yesterday.If they come up for some monies, I’ll just get-out of it. Thanks for the report…

Reply

22 Robbin Habermehl August 26, 2007 at 7:30 am

The first item in the social contract of DMOZ:

[...] The Open Directory Will Remain 100% Free [...]

Why don’t you contact one of the administrators? For more information check out http://www.dmoz.org/guidelines/admin/.

Reply

23 king jacob August 26, 2007 at 7:33 am

What would make him think anyone would pay 5000 for a dmoz listing?

Reply

24 joe August 26, 2007 at 7:43 am

You get enough offers to add sites for $$$ to DMOZ (I’ve been offered money plenty of times) you realize that there are surely going to be lots of editors who will take it. SOme of those corrupt editors would realize that given the amount of monetary offers they get, surely some websites could be pushed into paying.

PS probably a hacked account anyway

Reply

25 Ali August 26, 2007 at 8:32 am

That’s insane man! $5K for a feakin listing that would bring you like 10 visitors a month?! I’m glad I never went through the process of even putting my website listing in there.

Punks!

Reply

26 Travel Notebook August 26, 2007 at 8:41 am

Share the info he gave you, paypal or whatever it was so he can be tracked down.

Reply

27 Travel Notebook August 26, 2007 at 8:42 am

ummmm, get with it

Reply

28 Travel Notebook August 26, 2007 at 8:43 am

Well Shoe is a gazillionaire so why not shoot for the stars if your going to make demands :)

Reply

29 Travel Notebook August 26, 2007 at 8:44 am

Do you think Google will read this and put you back in? How many editors work on your specific section? Dont only a few people have access to each section of the DMOZ, making it easy to narrow down who it could have been?

Reply

30 Gecko Tales August 26, 2007 at 9:00 am

DMOZ has been a pain to deal with for so long that it isn’t worth it any more. You’re right – Google does need to drop it. DMOZ is dead…

Reply

31 Jeremy Steele August 26, 2007 at 9:26 am

This is why human edited things should be edited by the masses, not by 10 people.

Reply

32 Jeremy Steele August 26, 2007 at 9:28 am

Shoe is secretly Bill Gates in disguise. ;)

Reply

33 Jenstar August 26, 2007 at 9:30 am

Same thing happened to me for one of my sites… it got toasted from DMOZ too.

Reply

34 Rhys August 26, 2007 at 9:42 am

I smell a blogging backlash! :)

Reply

35 Jai August 26, 2007 at 9:55 am

Here are some ways to report Dmoz abuse.

Reply

36 Brent August 26, 2007 at 10:05 am

That’s riduculous! All this hub-bub about paid links and Google is still using DMOZ! Makes me think the same guys doing the extortion are Google employees. Might as well go to the W3C supporters page where you can get a permanent PR9 link for only 1K.

Reply

37 Any proof August 26, 2007 at 10:44 am

Shoe,
Which category are you talking about?

Reply

38 Jeba August 26, 2007 at 10:56 am

I dont even bother submitting my sites there.. Anyways it is not going to get listed :-| and I am not rich enough to pay 5K lol..

Reply

39 Theo August 26, 2007 at 11:42 am

Can you tell us what caused the header defacement?

Reply

40 SonicReducer August 26, 2007 at 11:52 am

Ya, you need to nail this guy.

Reply

41 Joe August 26, 2007 at 12:14 pm
42 Hi-Tech August 26, 2007 at 12:30 pm

Damn that guy’s got some ballz! Go get him Shoe – turn him in and expose DMOZ for the corrupt dinosaur it is! Keep us posted – please.

Reply

43 eTown Landlord August 26, 2007 at 1:49 pm

it’s funny in my opinion… screw them. You have your loyal fan base. Like you need the dmoz??? You should post this clown’s email address and have us flood him with spam.

Reply

44 Lore August 26, 2007 at 1:59 pm

That is so shady and should be blog about to get the word out how corrupt they are. I will add a post to my blog at

Reply

45 SEO Loser August 26, 2007 at 2:08 pm

typing dmoz.org takes less keystrokes than “ummmm, get with it”

Reply

46 estetik February 24, 2011 at 9:22 am

I am happy to find this very useful for me, as it contains lot of information. I always prefer to read the quality content
tr

Reply

47 Shane August 26, 2007 at 2:10 pm

Last I checked, extortion was still illegal. This is the kind of thing that could take down DMOZ … and THAT’s linkbait!

Reply

48 tonyinabox August 26, 2007 at 2:14 pm

nice idea! hehe

Reply

49 king jacob August 26, 2007 at 2:17 pm

Ever heard the saying two wrongs dont make a right. You cant condemn someone for doing something bad and then spam them, that would solve nothing.

Reply

50 Mark Hankins August 26, 2007 at 2:31 pm

If your friends at Google aren’t ready to dump DMOZ, perhaps they *are* ready to pressure DMOZ to help get a prosecutor involved and make a high-profile case against the “editor” responsible for the problem. Go over DMOZ’s head to Google.

Reply

51 browie August 26, 2007 at 2:39 pm

WoW, what a nerd. Let’s go e-thuggin’ on his a$$

Reply

52 Theo August 26, 2007 at 2:49 pm

DMOZ is including paid links…

Google Penalty!

Reply

53 garethjax August 26, 2007 at 2:51 pm

It’s time to crack down this organization. I’ve tried to submit some interesting no-profit organizations and even some customer sites but i’ve never received an answer. It’s funny that it’s full of cellphones tones 1-page sites and they won’t accept an art collective.

Reply

54 CPA Affiliates August 26, 2007 at 3:38 pm

for real i have to agree. DMOZ sucks…. But u are not the first to report of bribery within DMOZ as i saw a post somehwere guy would get u listed in dmoz for 100 bucks…

Reply

55 CPA Affiliates August 26, 2007 at 3:40 pm

for real Nail him to the wall.

Reply

56 Monty August 26, 2007 at 3:45 pm

Ya, unfortunately that W3C link isn’t permanent, it’s for one year. Plus, its nofollow…

Reply

57 hbh101 August 26, 2007 at 3:49 pm

I can’t find any evidence that you were ever listed anywhere in the ODP – - and I have looked back through the last two years at archive.org and several mirrors and data-users.

Which category was it supposedly listed in then?

Reply

58 Joost de Valk August 26, 2007 at 3:58 pm

Shoe, I hate DMOZ editors for doing stuff like this… Could you drop me a line telling me who it was, perhaps I can help. Looking at your URL in my editors account, it has a red by Jim Noble, based on this thread.

which does make me think you asked for it :P but seriously: this sucks. Drop me a line and I’ll do what I can to help out.

Reply

59 Artifexus August 26, 2007 at 3:59 pm

How utterly pathetic. I wonder just how many times this works, though?

Reply

60 The Anon Guy August 26, 2007 at 4:00 pm

I’ve been a DMOZ editor in the past and, quite frankly, maybe had two or three actual submissions come my way. The vast majority of my edits came from tracking down political candidates on my own and getting them to give me their web address when they went live.

I’ve also had my site listed, though I can’t ever recall receiving a hit from it. So I always figured the value of a DMOZ listing was that it would get you in the search engines faster not actually bring you visitors.

I think in a lot of cases, the reasons people aren’t listed is the fact that there are so many categories without current editors that there is no one to look at it. Demanding any form of payment or editing with a vendetta, though, is definitely across the line.

Reply

61 Glenn -- Write for Blogs August 26, 2007 at 4:06 pm

Since they use volunteer “section editors,” is it possible you hit a rouge?

Reply

62 corey August 26, 2007 at 4:50 pm

corrupt dmoz editor dot com is amusing if you’ve never read it

Reply

63 Jaan Kanellis August 26, 2007 at 5:14 pm

Who cares about DMOZ?

Reply

64 Andrew Johnson August 26, 2007 at 5:22 pm

Active communities — digg, blogs, wikipedia, newspapers, all surely play a larger role in the life of common internet users than directories. Yes, they can and are gamed. The difference is there is oversight and transparency.

Dmoz should have all of their editors personal information made public along with an edit history. Without that, there is no accountability.

Reply

65 ShoeMoney August 26, 2007 at 5:54 pm

ya he should update more =(

Reply

66 Modern Worker August 26, 2007 at 5:55 pm

Directories are over-hyped, imo. Screw DMOZ for being extortionists.

Reply

67 Steve Dickson August 26, 2007 at 6:09 pm
68 Viral Electronics August 26, 2007 at 6:32 pm

I totaly Agree. They need to discredit DMOZ and not count their pr transfer. I mean serously its empossible in most cases to get listed unless you know someone and are probaly buying your way in. Atleast yahoo and BOTW upfront tell you to pay and they have paid editors to give you a fair review.

Reply

69 jim August 26, 2007 at 6:46 pm

Probably used a throwaway emails… can’t be THAT stupid right? :)

Reply

70 jim August 26, 2007 at 6:47 pm

That’s why he didn’t pay… I can’t seem to get my site in but I’ve been doing fine without it. It’s one of those legacy things that everyone put on a pedestal that has since lost its luster and now it’s credibility.

Reply

71 Neil Patel August 26, 2007 at 8:09 pm

Google should acquire BOTW. That would be a perfect directory for them.

Reply

72 Charleston T. August 26, 2007 at 9:03 pm

$5,000 could buy a ton of links worth more than dmoz. They don’t pass that much PR, and they sure don’t send any business (unless a site just targets SEOs/web marketers) Smart move telling them to take a walk.

Reply

73 androo August 26, 2007 at 9:09 pm

that is one crazy email.. as if anyone uses DMOZ anymore..

Reply

74 Jim Kukral August 26, 2007 at 9:21 pm