<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: State Of Florida Investigating Ringtone Offers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/02/13/state-of-florida-investigating-ringtone-offers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/02/13/state-of-florida-investigating-ringtone-offers/</link>
	<description>Skills to Pay the Bills</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:12:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LB</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/02/13/state-of-florida-investigating-ringtone-offers/#comment-9374</link>
		<dc:creator>LB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 04:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=503#comment-9374</guid>
		<description>We call the government getting involved in private matters &quot;freedom&quot; &#039;round these parts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We call the government getting involved in private matters &#8220;freedom&#8221; &#8217;round these parts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/02/13/state-of-florida-investigating-ringtone-offers/#comment-9390</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 04:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=503#comment-9390</guid>
		<description>Maybe the system works differently in the States to here in Australia, but what exactly is the Government doing involved in a civil matter? Wouldn&#039;t a civil case be between the two parties involved, not the state?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the system works differently in the States to here in Australia, but what exactly is the Government doing involved in a civil matter? Wouldn&#8217;t a civil case be between the two parties involved, not the state?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/02/13/state-of-florida-investigating-ringtone-offers/#comment-9389</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 01:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=503#comment-9389</guid>
		<description>Good to see your site go down in flames... All the good members left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see your site go down in flames&#8230; All the good members left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RapidWeb</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/02/13/state-of-florida-investigating-ringtone-offers/#comment-9388</link>
		<dc:creator>RapidWeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 01:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=503#comment-9388</guid>
		<description>This may be better for the smaller affiliate ring tone people but personally can&#039;t understand why its been blown right out of proportion. 

Do fast food outlets get questioned because their burgers and fries don&#039;t look as they are advertised?

False advertising is every where thats why there is TOS on all sites somewhere in the smallest font possible, but its still there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may be better for the smaller affiliate ring tone people but personally can&#8217;t understand why its been blown right out of proportion. </p>
<p>Do fast food outlets get questioned because their burgers and fries don&#8217;t look as they are advertised?</p>
<p>False advertising is every where thats why there is TOS on all sites somewhere in the smallest font possible, but its still there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/02/13/state-of-florida-investigating-ringtone-offers/#comment-9375</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 22:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=503#comment-9375</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a narc, and they didn&#039;t raid my house either. They just came by to ask some questions to better understand how the affiliate marketing industry works. Same with Shawn, and same with asking AzoogleAds about ringtones, since they know more about that stuff than I would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a narc, and they didn&#8217;t raid my house either. They just came by to ask some questions to better understand how the affiliate marketing industry works. Same with Shawn, and same with asking AzoogleAds about ringtones, since they know more about that stuff than I would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/02/13/state-of-florida-investigating-ringtone-offers/#comment-9376</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 22:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=503#comment-9376</guid>
		<description>t&#039;s amazing what some affiliates still get away with these days when they market ringtones.  Even though there are tons of notices out there that you are not allowed to market on search engines using &quot;free&quot; in your headlines or ads, you still see ads for FREE Ringtones from people like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tonesonthenet.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.tonesonthenet.com&lt;/a&gt; and ads with domains like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.totally-free-ringtones.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.totally-free-ringtones.net&lt;/a&gt; etc..  Even ringtone companies themselves seem to be getting around the &quot;rules&quot; by creating ads that say Hassle-Free Ringtones.  All these guys are at the top of search results because their ads get a much higher CTR than publishers that are doing the right thing and are staying away from using the word &quot;free&quot;.  I agree with shoemoney, once all these bad players are gone, all of us will get more traffic.  Hopefully this investigation will make all these guys stop</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>t&#8217;s amazing what some affiliates still get away with these days when they market ringtones.  Even though there are tons of notices out there that you are not allowed to market on search engines using &#8220;free&#8221; in your headlines or ads, you still see ads for FREE Ringtones from people like <a href="http://www.tonesonthenet.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.tonesonthenet.com</a> and ads with domains like <a href="http://www.totally-free-ringtones.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.totally-free-ringtones.net</a> etc..  Even ringtone companies themselves seem to be getting around the &#8220;rules&#8221; by creating ads that say Hassle-Free Ringtones.  All these guys are at the top of search results because their ads get a much higher CTR than publishers that are doing the right thing and are staying away from using the word &#8220;free&#8221;.  I agree with shoemoney, once all these bad players are gone, all of us will get more traffic.  Hopefully this investigation will make all these guys stop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis Cannell</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/02/13/state-of-florida-investigating-ringtone-offers/#comment-9386</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Cannell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=503#comment-9386</guid>
		<description>This is actually good for some of the little ringtone affiliate players out there like myself. I always hated complying with the TOS by removing the terms &quot;Free, No Cost&quot; etc from an ad when my competition clearly wasn&#039;t following suit. Makes it a little harder to compete and slims the margins up for a lot of markets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is actually good for some of the little ringtone affiliate players out there like myself. I always hated complying with the TOS by removing the terms &#8220;Free, No Cost&#8221; etc from an ad when my competition clearly wasn&#8217;t following suit. Makes it a little harder to compete and slims the margins up for a lot of markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

