Comments on: Not Safe For Work Links – NSFW.US – Link Condom ++ http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/01/30/not-safe-for-work-links-nsfwus-link-condom/ Skills to Pay the Bills Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:45:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: coop http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/01/30/not-safe-for-work-links-nsfwus-link-condom/#comment-8672 coop Wed, 11 Apr 2007 06:15:21 +0000 http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=476#comment-8672 rel="nsfw" would be f'in awesome rel=”nsfw” would be f’in awesome

]]> By: engtech http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/01/30/not-safe-for-work-links-nsfwus-link-condom/#comment-8671 engtech Fri, 02 Feb 2007 20:53:00 +0000 http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=476#comment-8671 Just a thought, maybe you should team up with the rel="nsfw" guys? Get the people who are creating extensions to support rel="nsfw" also support nsfw.us http://microformatique.com/?p=76 http://pj.doland.org/archives/041571.php Just a thought, maybe you should team up with the rel=”nsfw” guys?

Get the people who are creating extensions to support rel=”nsfw” also support nsfw.us

http://microformatique.com/?p=76
http://pj.doland.org/archives/041571.php

]]> By: King http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/01/30/not-safe-for-work-links-nsfwus-link-condom/#comment-8670 King Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:23:03 +0000 http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=476#comment-8670 nice twist on an old concept nice twist on an old concept

]]> By: Jon http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/01/30/not-safe-for-work-links-nsfwus-link-condom/#comment-8669 Jon Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:35:23 +0000 http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=476#comment-8669 The results are in a frame so people can easily copy/paste the url with the NSFW warning - instead of pasting a direct link to the content. That was the concept anyhow. The results are in a frame so people can easily copy/paste the url with the NSFW warning – instead of pasting a direct link to the content. That was the concept anyhow.

]]> By: Zune (GeorgeB) http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/01/30/not-safe-for-work-links-nsfwus-link-condom/#comment-8668 Zune (GeorgeB) Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:14:29 +0000 http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=476#comment-8668 Actually shoe, I don't know about other users out there but the US DOD will view this site as a "proxy" or "anonymizer" type site and block it as well. Constantly trying to access sites via a proxy and bypass gov network restrictions is a non no as well :(. It's just as bad as going to the NSFW site istelf because it's considered a security violation. Actually shoe, I don’t know about other users out there but the US DOD will view this site as a “proxy” or “anonymizer” type site and block it as well. Constantly trying to access sites via a proxy and bypass gov network restrictions is a non no as well :( . It’s just as bad as going to the NSFW site istelf because it’s considered a security violation.

]]> By: Garrett http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/01/30/not-safe-for-work-links-nsfwus-link-condom/#comment-8667 Garrett Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:12:49 +0000 http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=476#comment-8667 People can't say "f*ck" at work anymore? What's this world coming to? People can’t say “f*ck” at work anymore? What’s this world coming to?

]]> By: Lee Bandoni http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/01/30/not-safe-for-work-links-nsfwus-link-condom/#comment-8666 Lee Bandoni Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:53:19 +0000 http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=476#comment-8666 In a day when we see thousands of EXACT clones of successful websites its refreshing to see just a little modification can improve the users experience and bring a whole new use to an established service In a day when we see thousands of EXACT clones of successful websites its refreshing to see just a little modification can improve the users experience and bring a whole new use to an established service

]]>