<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vote For Jen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/01/24/vote-for-jen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/01/24/vote-for-jen/</link>
	<description>Skills to Pay the Bills</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modern SEO News Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/01/24/vote-for-jen/#comment-8351</link>
		<dc:creator>Modern SEO News Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 19:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=461#comment-8351</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Shoemoney Effect...&lt;/strong&gt;

Andy Beal has been putting up polls on his blog and one of his recent polls was to find out who was the &#8220;Queen of Search&#8221; on the net. There was an odd twist caused by Shoemoney which is hilarious in a way!


The options to Andy Beal&#8217;s...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Shoemoney Effect&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Andy Beal has been putting up polls on his blog and one of his recent polls was to find out who was the &#8220;Queen of Search&#8221; on the net. There was an odd twist caused by Shoemoney which is hilarious in a way!</p>
<p>The options to Andy Beal&#8217;s&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris boggs</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/01/24/vote-for-jen/#comment-8364</link>
		<dc:creator>chris boggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=461#comment-8364</guid>
		<description>umm hello people...someone has been voting over and over for Jen.. don&#039;t think I don&#039;t think she deserves it as much as the rest, but the same thing happened to me last year when Oilman decided to keep hitting refresh on a poll for the sempo board.  no way that total is accurate, no matter how many readers went over there on the shoe&#039;s request.

hehe good one though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>umm hello people&#8230;someone has been voting over and over for Jen.. don&#8217;t think I don&#8217;t think she deserves it as much as the rest, but the same thing happened to me last year when Oilman decided to keep hitting refresh on a poll for the sempo board.  no way that total is accurate, no matter how many readers went over there on the shoe&#8217;s request.</p>
<p>hehe good one though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShoeMoney</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/01/24/vote-for-jen/#comment-8365</link>
		<dc:creator>ShoeMoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=461#comment-8365</guid>
		<description>wah wah wah wahh =(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wah wah wah wahh =(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samn</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/01/24/vote-for-jen/#comment-8363</link>
		<dc:creator>Samn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 01:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=461#comment-8363</guid>
		<description>I think this was really unfair :-(

&quot;Shoemoney&quot; might as well have been an option on that poll now, because people have only voted for Jen because you told them too. I&#039;m sure if Jen is really as honest and whitehat as she says on her blog, she&#039;d not be too happy with what you did here. A link to the poll with no advice would have been much better -- and it wouldnt have ruined the chances for the other woman who dont have such influential friends. (I know its just a poll, but i bet at least one person on that poll would liked to have seen themselves with a chance of winning ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this was really unfair <img src='http://www.shoemoney.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&#8220;Shoemoney&#8221; might as well have been an option on that poll now, because people have only voted for Jen because you told them too. I&#8217;m sure if Jen is really as honest and whitehat as she says on her blog, she&#8217;d not be too happy with what you did here. A link to the poll with no advice would have been much better &#8212; and it wouldnt have ruined the chances for the other woman who dont have such influential friends. (I know its just a poll, but i bet at least one person on that poll would liked to have seen themselves with a chance of winning <img src='http://www.shoemoney.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/01/24/vote-for-jen/#comment-8349</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=461#comment-8349</guid>
		<description>Shoemoney, you are absolutely correct, Jen is the Queen of Search, and I guess I was part of that 2% who voted for her initially, but now that she has 50% of the vote it looks like she will win the recognition she deserves.  Thanks for bringing it to peoples&#039; attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shoemoney, you are absolutely correct, Jen is the Queen of Search, and I guess I was part of that 2% who voted for her initially, but now that she has 50% of the vote it looks like she will win the recognition she deserves.  Thanks for bringing it to peoples&#8217; attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juicy flex</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/01/24/vote-for-jen/#comment-8350</link>
		<dc:creator>Juicy flex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=461#comment-8350</guid>
		<description>OK, so for the rest of us - which one is Jensense; Jennifer Laycock og Slegg?

Ok, I could probably have found it out in the time it took typing this comment, but I wanted to comment ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, so for the rest of us &#8211; which one is Jensense; Jennifer Laycock og Slegg?</p>
<p>Ok, I could probably have found it out in the time it took typing this comment, but I wanted to comment <img src='http://www.shoemoney.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2007/01/24/vote-for-jen/#comment-8356</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 07:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=461#comment-8356</guid>
		<description>Wow yes she&#039;s up past 50% -- competition over.  Winner: Jen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow yes she&#8217;s up past 50% &#8212; competition over.  Winner: Jen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

