Its been no secret that Google has been working on launching a new quality score bot. I have read threads about it on pretty much every forum. I have also been getting tons of emails about the subject asking me what I think is going to happen.
I talked to a close (anonymous) friend inside Adwords and she tells me the big changes are purely targeted at the arbitragers. This really again should come as no shock. She was super vague on specifics but did tell me that they were fingerprinting (my word) links and text on page that would indicate the page was a landing for contextual search arbitrage or cost per action arbitrage. For those in Rio Linda that means if your running a landing page and directly linking with your affiliate link or running a scraper with nothing but Yahoo/Google ads then YOUR IN TROUBLE!
People inside Microsoft AdCenter ( btw <3 u guys @ adcenter ) also told me a while back that they had finger printed affiliate links and were going to start penalizing (denying or making you pay more) those that were doing that.
Soooo what does all this mean? MASK YOUR LINKS.
If you have a landing page for products for science sake (anyone watch southpark in the last 2 weeks will get that joke) DO NOT directly link with your affiliate code. Make sure you have your own internal redirection system.
For instance if I was paying for Google Adwords to goto shoemoney.com and on shoemoney.com I had offers for RING TONES with AzoogleAds.
I have 2 ways to link to AzoogleAds Ring tone offers.
http://c.azjmp.com/az/ch.php?f=3375&i=12345 –> THIS IS BAD
OR
http://shoemoney.com/link.php?go=3375 –> this is GOOD!
Then of course in your robots.txt you disallow link.php
Ohh and for those of you doing contextual arbitrage…. unless your cloaking your content prepare for impact.
Keep in mind Google is not going to stop letting you do this… They are just going to charge you more cause of your “quality score”. There is just to much money to be made right now in arbitrage and Google wants a bigger slice.
- Comment Likes 
- Comment Dislikes
February 3, 2008 at 3:00 am
IT is funny how sooo many Ads are out to sell you a systeme that Google is trying to kill. Promising you riches and gems and sharks with Lasers…
October 11, 2007 at 9:17 am
thanks man, you saved my life
August 7, 2007 at 9:43 am
Jack shut the f..k up
December 19, 2006 at 11:49 am
I’m new to this adwords and affiliate stuff. I set up an ad. Everything worked well. When I logged back in, my keywords jumped to $10! This may sound like a stupid question, but hopefully you will see me ignorant of the terminology and how the internet works. My question is: Does the dramatic increase of my cost of keywords have anything to do with the arbitrage and adsense stuff you are talking about? The site I am affiliated to does not have any ads.
I’m trying to make adwords work, but I’m failing miserably. My husband is ready to strangle me because I keep trying, but if everyone else is making money, then I can too.
December 5, 2006 at 6:37 pm
Adbrite is looking better and better everyday.
December 4, 2006 at 2:04 am
In the past search engines have had trouble executing javascript. If CJ is still worth using, based on your recent post a big if, then would using their javascript URLs be a quick and simple way around having too many outbound affiliate links?
December 2, 2006 at 1:01 pm
What’s a good cloaking script? I use ccount, but don’t like the idea of a flat text database.
November 25, 2006 at 10:43 pm
this whole page is funny…
if there weren’t so many people creating sites with no content, and only adsense ads (so called mfa sites). using adwords to cheat people into going to their sites, so they can try and get rich quick for doing nothing isntead of getting fof their butts and finding a real job, none of this would even be a discussion.
I personally know alot of people who use adwords to get trraffic to their sites, that dont display any ads at all. I also know people who use adsense for sites where they sell products. they are real sites, with real content, and a real purpose other than cheating people out of their money.
As a publisher, i’m rather lucky with adsense.. I display the ads on pages with certain keywords and cotnent, and use the filter to block ‘mfa’ sites and sites that have nothing but links and no content (and no real purpose for those who visit them)
I strongly back google on it’s quality bot for adwords subscribers, and having a human in the mix to make sure the system doesn’t confuse mfa sites with real sites. It may not be a perfect system, but it’s a start, and shows google is aware of the people who are trying to take advantage of it all.
If you really want to make money from google adsense, and benefit from adwords advertising, make a real site, with quality content. Put some of the thought and energy being ut into making a nothing site to cheat the system into something people will want to visit, isntead of tricking them into it.
November 22, 2006 at 12:48 pm
actually I think using these services is a bad idea since they use a 301 redirect. Might as well be the regular link.
November 22, 2006 at 12:12 pm
you could also use a url shortener like http://tinyhttp.com
November 20, 2006 at 5:12 pm
ummm who said you alter the adsense code… i think you got really confused.
November 20, 2006 at 4:55 pm
What about the rest of us who use Adsense standard not premium?
We can’t mess with the codes for cloaking… Does anybody have an idea or just wait for them to swallow us in full?
November 20, 2006 at 2:07 pm
What about GoTryThis. Has anyone used this redirect program? Is it any good, and would it work for CJ link redirects?
November 20, 2006 at 9:24 am
When changing your urls by using php to redirect affiliate links, what is the best way to write that php script? What I mean is what is the best method for redirecting, not for writing the script.
November 16, 2006 at 5:09 pm
Wow…I have a lot of URLs to rewrite.
I can’t wait to see if my existing sites are effected after the which or if I will need to just use new domains.
November 16, 2006 at 3:11 pm
FANTASTIC! I love that your going to have to use cloaking a redirection now. Just makes the barrier to entry for new people, more complex.
November 15, 2006 at 6:08 am
What if you placed the contextual ads on your landing page inside a frame? Would the Google bot still see them?
Thanks
J
November 14, 2006 at 8:54 pm
business in general IS arbitrage (buy lower, sell higher)
of course it will make trillions a year lol
November 14, 2006 at 11:48 am
Shoemoney: What about using CSS to make a page more relevant and maybe using text-indent, visible, display to hide text like navigation or h1 tags? Can google bot recognize these techniques?
November 14, 2006 at 10:55 am
Mr Shoemony, when masking CJ links do you use the ‘afsrc’ parameter as CJ outline in the second to last paragraph here: http://www.cj.com/code_of_conduct.html
November 13, 2006 at 8:07 pm
Good post Jeremy. Also saw this coming for a while now. Arbitrage in general will still make webmasters millions a year (combined, not per webmaster), but now it will make the really lazy ones wisen up and do some real work. It’s not even all that much work, but it’s truly amazing to see how people can be so lazy when the chance to make so much goddamn cash is right in front of their faces, and all they have to do is be a little creative and spend a tad more time with their links. I’ll bet we’ll see lots of people all over the different forums bitching about this and how they never saw it coming either. Fools!
November 13, 2006 at 5:17 pm
In response to Google’s new landing page split testing tool.
Once again Google is providing tools that allow them to collect as much private company data from you as possible and close the customer loop.
Just follow a typical surfer as he enters your site.
Google Adwords – clicks and cost per conversion recorded
Google Analytics – detailed click information recorded
Google Website Optimizer – page elements recorded
Google Checkout – product or service sales price recorded.
Google now has your:
* Avg bid price $.40
* Avg blue widget cost per conversion $80.00
* Avg sale price $120.00
* YOUR PROFIT MARGIN $40.00
Google now understands your ad budget, your cost per acquisition, product or service sale price, and detailed customer information.
So with you and thousands of your competitors providing this free market data from advertising to sale, the loop is now closed, allowing Google to make arbitrary judgements on bid prices based upon the FREE and PRIVATE information you have provided.
One can argue that the market will determine Adwords bid prices however we already know that with Google’s landing page quality update this is simply not true. Bid prices escalated dramatically for advertisers that were deemed unsatisfactory by Google’s standards.
I would be very wary about providing so much private internal marketing data to a company that is charging you for advertising. As marketers we should know that providing your most intimate details for that “t-shirt” is simply not good business.
November 12, 2006 at 11:56 pm
Thanks for the info shoe…
November 12, 2006 at 8:15 pm
I pulled conversion tracking off my sites about 7 months ago.
Google wants to know everything about you and then they use it to raise prices- why give it to them.
You think if they find out you’re paying $1 per click to sell a $2000 product they’ll let that slide?
IMO this move is to soften people up for CPA- the totally invasive and final Google “slap” that will require advertisers to open their books totally to the Goog.
November 12, 2006 at 5:30 pm
I wonder why Google is concerning themselves with how users utilize Adwords to monetize their marketing efforts. Adwords have already become an over-priced platform with an hoard of invalid/fake clicks, so I assume this would make the Adwords platform less appealing if they increase your click price because the landing page contains affiliate or other PPC ads.
November 12, 2006 at 4:28 pm
Who didn’t see this coming? :p
November 12, 2006 at 3:41 pm
Some people should consider taking off conversion tracking – If Google’s going to price gouge us, there’s no reason to make it any easier on them in determining who’s doing well with AdWords.
I suppose if anyone plans on cloaking, consider sending your affiliate links to somewhere offsite for the redirection decision to made.
November 12, 2006 at 10:50 am
The losing battle that Google and other SE’s will have is the affiliate marketing model is not going away. As Shoe noted in another entry, it is a beautiful dynamic for the businesses because they have fixed marketing costs. So they are not going to stop doing it, and risk the ups and downs of only running their own campaigns. So some middle ground is going to have to exist where affiliates can continue to succesful market on the search engines.
November 11, 2006 at 7:46 pm
i always thought the purpose of adwords was to purchase advertising in order to sell a product, why should an affiliate be discriminated against. What the hell does Google want Adwords to be used for.
November 11, 2006 at 6:44 pm
If you have $10 ads you have been “slapped” becasue of low QS or poor click through rates. It can also happen if several affiliates use direct links. Or maybe Google just doesn’t like you!
Good Luck!
November 11, 2006 at 3:59 pm
If I am using a clickbank affiliate link page, can the google bot crawl through that to see that the affiliate page has sufficient content on the page to make it have a quality score?
November 11, 2006 at 10:33 am
The term “CPA Arbitrage” is a little bit frustrating. It basically says that affiliates in general really aren’t welcome to advertise. Of course, I can get behind that from a user experience standpoint, but it’s just so hard to let go!
Of course, it’s out of situations like this that opportunities for crafty people often arise!
November 11, 2006 at 9:59 am
Thanks for the advice. I have made the changes.
November 11, 2006 at 5:04 am
Thanks for the info, Shoe..
November 10, 2006 at 11:58 pm
I have been hearing about $10 min bids in Adwords for some time now, but it had not affected me. Not sooner did I read this article, watch a few eps of this seasons LOST, did I see a bunch of $10 bids. LOL. Sheeeet. cart.php sounds about right to me.
November 10, 2006 at 5:50 pm
Internet is business. Websites are business. Landing pages sell products (otherwise who’d pay for PPC?).
Does google honestly expect people to pay for PPC and provide free “informative” site that is not commercial or who’s sole purpose is to sell something? LoL
They will never remove commercial sites that sell products, it’s just a nature of the game, especially that yahoo and msn are catching up.
November 10, 2006 at 11:56 am
was your close friend at google vague about specifics or are you being vague on what you’re passing on to the outside world?
November 10, 2006 at 10:11 am
What do you make of Google’s job posting for Ads Quality Rater positions. If there’s a human in the loop (like with Overture), masking/cloaking isn’t going to help.
November 10, 2006 at 8:43 am
Whether you’re using AdWords for arbitrage or no, spend a bit of time reading Google’s landing page quality guidelines. You should also read my posting Landing Pages and Pay-Per-Click: A New Content Outlet.
Think of it this way: don’t write landing pages, create landing sites.
And yes, it takes more work. But if you want lower ad prices that’s what you have to do…
November 10, 2006 at 6:58 am
I’m a noob here, but does this apply to adwords that link straight to affiliate page (without landing page)?
November 10, 2006 at 6:17 am
What if I am not doing a 301 redirect just temp redirect. Do you recommend doing it your way with that “jumpscript”. If so why? Thanks shoemoney!
November 10, 2006 at 5:33 am
I would not suggest cloaking and no use of the robots.txt for declining access to the specific files, as long as it looks for G like you have your affiliate links on another page than your landingpage you’re OK! Best is, if your affiliate links are far, far away from your original landing, i dont hide anything from google nor do i make use of robots.txt or some other methods and my average cpc got lowered after the recent algo change, even my rankings are better than before and my overall traffic has increased =)
November 10, 2006 at 2:43 am
you cant mask adsense links… see cloaking
November 10, 2006 at 2:42 am
thats a good question… I think I would first try a new domain and see how it went. If all else fails new adwords account.
November 10, 2006 at 1:21 am
So what do you do if yoru landing page has adsense ads?
November 10, 2006 at 12:57 am
Shoemoney, how do you mask your links if your landing page has Adsense? What strategy would you take?
November 10, 2006 at 12:01 am
Shoe, I hope you don’t me posting this here but here’s a free script from Hotscripts that masks links using PHP with a click counter and admin panel. I’ve got it up and running now and it’s working nicely. Links are in the form of ‘click.php?id=45′
http://www.hotscripts.com/Detailed/36874.html
November 9, 2006 at 11:47 pm
Just to be safe, I’ve hidden my links (.htaccess). I’ll let you know how the landing page takes the hit (if it does at all, 0 effect so far).
November 9, 2006 at 11:26 pm
Google adwords just totally SUCKS! I’ve been running a campaign for months now and just a couple of days ago I added a few words to it and, boom, they started upping my bid prices by 50% to 100%. I must have tripped some filter because I’ve been running this campaign for more than 6 months. I can’t even get them to answer my emails. Google is evil!
November 9, 2006 at 10:29 pm
If my site already has a low landing page quality score, can I rework the the page to increase the score? Do I need to scrap the domain and go with a new URL?
November 9, 2006 at 9:40 pm
hmm adsense is like 90% of googles PROFIT. they are not going to abandon there cash cow
Would you ?
November 9, 2006 at 9:40 pm
pertaining to this post you would only want to disallow your “jumpscript” if you will. If your using .htaccess then your sending a 301 redirect which for linking purposes might get you in trouble… but again better then linking directly.
November 9, 2006 at 9:38 pm
That is a good questions chad. but I think that tiny url is a 301 redirect which technically if they followed it would show the same… still better then straight affiliate links
November 9, 2006 at 9:01 pm
Do I still have to disallow any directories or files in robot.txt if I mask my affiliate links using .htaccess?
November 9, 2006 at 8:36 pm
I thought Google should get rid of this ads for ads program because it does not serve the end user. But it just makes too much money so you hit the nail on the head when you said, “They are not going to block them…. Just charge them more”. Thank goodness their motto is don’t be evil and not don’t be greedy. But isn’t greedy, evil?
November 9, 2006 at 8:35 pm
It seems that there are far more ways to cloak arbitrage than to battle against it. =)
November 9, 2006 at 7:13 pm
you could even go a step further I guess and cloak the link so the google bot sees a fatty content page.. iplists.com
November 9, 2006 at 6:46 pm
Thanks Shoe. After years of blogging I am just now setting up a keyword campaign for arbitrage.
This advice will help a great deal!
November 9, 2006 at 6:34 pm
thx jeremy
November 9, 2006 at 6:15 pm
Shoe, are there any negative implications to using a free service like TinyURL?
Thanks
November 9, 2006 at 6:01 pm
You should be ok I would think… I guess you would have to tell us. If your cloaking for googlebot(s) not showing them the framed content then you should be ok.
November 9, 2006 at 5:49 pm
Will this affect iframe usage? I.e. I send clicks to my page, that has some nice cloakced SE content, but then just iframes the add link so the user can see it. Will that be bad or no?
November 9, 2006 at 5:36 pm
probably just use .htaccess to redirect based on useragent ?
Here is a some good info on cloaking-
http://www.ihategoogle.org/?postid=508
November 9, 2006 at 5:33 pm
http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=113702
scroll down to the example using the header function
November 9, 2006 at 5:28 pm
Anyone got a tutorial or an explenation how to make your links like this : http://shoemoney.com/link.php?go=3375 ?
November 9, 2006 at 5:10 pm
Thanks Shoemoney! Great info as always.
Question: If you had to pick a method of cloaking without php what method would use?
Thanks in advance,
JB
November 9, 2006 at 5:05 pm
Hi – Just got done reading your posts here, and the comments. I have a question I am hoping someone can answer – Can someone define for me what you mean by “contextual arbitrage”?
I understand the concept itself – buying adwords ads and pointing the customer to another page with adsense ads. I guess what I am trying to understand is – if your page has very relevant content, meets the TOS, and has everything google expects or wants to see, like at least one outbound link – are they going to have a problem with this? Can someone please elaborate?
Thanks,
Michael
November 9, 2006 at 4:43 pm
I’m a complete noob to all of this, but sounds like what you describe might be good business practice too – cart.php would keep track of all of affiliate link clickthroughs so you can do an audit at the end of the month.
November 9, 2006 at 4:03 pm
They are not going to block them…. Just charge them more
There is just to much money to be made right now in arbitrage and google wants a bigger piece.
November 9, 2006 at 4:01 pm
This is about people who are spending money on adwords to make money on contextual or affiliate pages.
November 9, 2006 at 4:01 pm
SOLID!
November 9, 2006 at 4:00 pm
haha nice Paul
November 9, 2006 at 3:58 pm
Science H. Logic that is good advice.
November 9, 2006 at 3:57 pm
Shoe, are you talking about people buying adwords for arbitrage or people running adsense who’s traffic comes from elsewhere?
November 9, 2006 at 3:55 pm
Instead of link.php call it cart.php
November 9, 2006 at 3:53 pm
I’ve been watching GoogleBot and they are actually ignoring robots.txt at times. They will crawl, just not put in the public index. So just because you use robots.txt like that, doesn’t mean they won’t find the links.
I would instead use a form of link cloaking mixed with the redirection. So your redirect link will look at the ip, useragent, and whether the browser accepts cookies. If the IP or user gent show google or the user doesn’t accept cookies (does gbot accept cookies these days?), have that redirect go to a standard domain.com url without the affiliate links. If it looks like a real user, then throw them the affiliate link.
I would still use the robots.txt, but don’t count on that to work all the time.
Also note that Google is sending bots not tagged with the proper user agent. See graywolfs comments here http://www.threadwatch.org/node/10124
November 9, 2006 at 3:50 pm
Google’s answer to The Great Question is not my answer.
November 9, 2006 at 3:40 pm
Grrr… more bad news
November 9, 2006 at 3:32 pm
This is going to be very interesting to watch. For a while I was thinking that it wasn’t in Google’s interest to pursue click-flippers because of the revenue that it brought to Google. Now, I’m really curious to see how this is going to affect all the folks who have been so go-nuts about click flipping.
I’ll make the popcorn. This should be good.
November 9, 2006 at 3:08 pm
eeeeek i need to update my links