<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sew Author Catherine Seda Clearly Does Not Get it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shoemoney.com/2006/09/28/sew-author-catherine-seda-clearly-does-not-get-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2006/09/28/sew-author-catherine-seda-clearly-does-not-get-it/</link>
	<description>By Jeremy Schoemaker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:31:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Marketing 2006: Τα 102 σημαντικότερα γεγονότα της χρονιάς &#187; Το Βlog για τις Μηχανές Αναζήτησης</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2006/09/28/sew-author-catherine-seda-clearly-does-not-get-it/#comment-114769</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine Marketing 2006: Τα 102 σημαντικότερα γεγονότα της χρονιάς &#187; Το Βlog για τις Μηχανές Αναζήτησης</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 04:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=305#comment-114769</guid>
		<description>[...] The Arbitrage Debate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Arbitrage Debate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2006/09/28/sew-author-catherine-seda-clearly-does-not-get-it/#comment-5021</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=305#comment-5021</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Catherine Seda wants to be a rock star but doesn’t know how to act like one.</p>
<p>One of her “monthly? (more like quarterly) e-zines ended up in my junk folder so I emailed her to give a heads up and let her know why I thought it may have happened. Just a professional courtesy. I got a canned response telling me that “maybe?, one her assistants “might? get back to me if it was important enough. Never heard from her.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I emailed Seth Godin about a broken link on his web site. He emailed me back personally within 2 hours to thank me and started a one-on-one dialog with me.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just guessing, but I&#8217;ll bet if I emailed Shoemoney about a major problem on his site, he&#8217;d extent the courtesy of a response.</p>
<p>Seth Godin = Rock Star<br />
ShoeMoney = Rock Star<br />
Catherine Seda = Not a Rock Star</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AussieWebmaster</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2006/09/28/sew-author-catherine-seda-clearly-does-not-get-it/#comment-5020</link>
		<dc:creator>AussieWebmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=305#comment-5020</guid>
		<description>Can we say link bait.............

Nice job Shoe.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we say link bait&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Nice job Shoe&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine Seda</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2006/09/28/sew-author-catherine-seda-clearly-does-not-get-it/#comment-5019</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine Seda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=305#comment-5019</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch. Okay…</p>
<p>The article—all of the speakers approved their comments before my article was published (I don’t want to risk misrepresenting them). In follow-up interviews, I did ask several folks for more info so each person could express his/her viewpoint (hence, the additional comments from Kris). </p>
<p>People are passionate about arbitrage. They love it or loathe it. The speakers made that point clear. I wanted to show these extremes to people who couldn’t be there. That’s why I ended my article with “Generally speaking, business owners and marketing agencies see arbitrage as a detrimental practice, while those profiting as ad publishers and affiliates like the opportunity arbitrage presents.? <a href="http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=3623543" rel="nofollow">http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=3623543</a> </p>
<p>The session—hey now; I don’t recall jumping up and down for Tim (although you paint a pretty funny picture). Nope, I just met him at SES. I think explaining the debate between Tim and Jake shows how (in general), people doing arbitrage think it’s good while those who don’t think it’s bad. Obviously, this is an over-simplified explanation. However, it’s easier to start here when writing an article that has to be understood by a newbie audience too. </p>
<p>Hey Kris, thanks for commenting. I’ve sent this to the panelists for their comments. Yup, good link bait for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2006/09/28/sew-author-catherine-seda-clearly-does-not-get-it/#comment-5018</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=305#comment-5018</guid>
		<description>Good Post + Search arb is not a bad thing despite the bad press it gets. Clearly there will be bad search arb and good search arb in exactly the same way that there are good and bad affiliates. In reality they are very similar, affiliates have to work harder but the resulting commision returns a better margin and both are simply connecting users with advertisers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Post + Search arb is not a bad thing despite the bad press it gets. Clearly there will be bad search arb and good search arb in exactly the same way that there are good and bad affiliates. In reality they are very similar, affiliates have to work harder but the resulting commision returns a better margin and both are simply connecting users with advertisers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2006/09/28/sew-author-catherine-seda-clearly-does-not-get-it/#comment-5017</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=305#comment-5017</guid>
		<description>Dumb broad...she definetly missed the boat~

Arbitrage rules!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dumb broad&#8230;she definetly missed the boat~</p>
<p>Arbitrage rules!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lincoln NE Technology Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2006/09/28/sew-author-catherine-seda-clearly-does-not-get-it/#comment-5016</link>
		<dc:creator>Lincoln NE Technology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=305#comment-5016</guid>
		<description>Nice post, Shoe.  Did you notice that about mid way down your post your text is being clipped on the left?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, Shoe.  Did you notice that about mid way down your post your text is being clipped on the left?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
