<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google is on the offensive with paid links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shoemoney.com/2005/12/14/google-is-on-the-offensive-with-paid-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2005/12/14/google-is-on-the-offensive-with-paid-links/</link>
	<description>Skills to Pay the Bills</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joline A.</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2005/12/14/google-is-on-the-offensive-with-paid-links/#comment-233053</link>
		<dc:creator>Joline A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=65#comment-233053</guid>
		<description>Admiring the time and effort you put into your website and in depth information you offer. It&#039;s good to come across a blog every once in a while that isn&#039;t the same out of date rehashed material. Fantastic read! I&#039;ve bookmarked your site and I&#039;m including your RSS feeds to my Google account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Admiring the time and effort you put into your website and in depth information you offer. It&#8217;s good to come across a blog every once in a while that isn&#8217;t the same out of date rehashed material. Fantastic read! I&#8217;ve bookmarked your site and I&#8217;m including your RSS feeds to my Google account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No more sponsored themes? What BS! at Blogging For Money</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2005/12/14/google-is-on-the-offensive-with-paid-links/#comment-19932</link>
		<dc:creator>No more sponsored themes? What BS! at Blogging For Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=65#comment-19932</guid>
		<description>[...] themes? I think someone is having delusions of grandeur here, thinking that they can act like the Big G and paid links. Well, I have invested time and money into sponsored WordPress themes (which you can see here) and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] themes? I think someone is having delusions of grandeur here, thinking that they can act like the Big G and paid links. Well, I have invested time and money into sponsored WordPress themes (which you can see here) and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Savage</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2005/12/14/google-is-on-the-offensive-with-paid-links/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Savage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 03:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=65#comment-633</guid>
		<description>do a search for popular ringtones. i win!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do a search for popular ringtones. i win!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2005/12/14/google-is-on-the-offensive-with-paid-links/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=65#comment-632</guid>
		<description>SpaceWar.com is an excellent examply on why google is no good... Authority spam is starting to rear it&#039;s ugly head.. I wish google would ban them from the index and from adsense as their authority spam are made for adsense pages...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SpaceWar.com is an excellent examply on why google is no good&#8230; Authority spam is starting to rear it&#8217;s ugly head.. I wish google would ban them from the index and from adsense as their authority spam are made for adsense pages&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattboy</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2005/12/14/google-is-on-the-offensive-with-paid-links/#comment-631</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=65#comment-631</guid>
		<description>I certainly hope they wont be penalising for buying links, paying for advertising is just a part of business.

All in all, it will just lead to more advanced linking strategies. Links in copy as mentioned by Ol. Might actually lead to higher conversions for advertisers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly hope they wont be penalising for buying links, paying for advertising is just a part of business.</p>
<p>All in all, it will just lead to more advanced linking strategies. Links in copy as mentioned by Ol. Might actually lead to higher conversions for advertisers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ol</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2005/12/14/google-is-on-the-offensive-with-paid-links/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>Ol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=65#comment-630</guid>
		<description>This has been in the pipeline for a long time...

From G&#039;s point of view It&#039;s not *that* difficult to identify certian areas within a sites pages as a place where sponsors go.

Discounting links that follow the string &#039;sponsors&#039; is a pretty good way to start. 

I first read about Google and this about a year ago following that coding competition they run.

Some guy wrote a paper on &#039;Link Stemming&#039; and it talked about using LSI type stuff to filter out links that just don&#039;t fit in with the site, and kinda stand out... [It was a little more detailed than that of course)

I lost the URL ages ago and I&#039;ve been looking for it again fopr a while now, but it looks like the paper is buried somewhere and I can&#039;t find it. 

Hell, maybe Google sandboxed the site I read it on.

I doubt they&#039;ll be penalising anyone for buying links, but they won&#039;t have any value...

Links in copy - that&#039;s where it&#039;s at...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has been in the pipeline for a long time&#8230;</p>
<p>From G&#8217;s point of view It&#8217;s not *that* difficult to identify certian areas within a sites pages as a place where sponsors go.</p>
<p>Discounting links that follow the string &#8216;sponsors&#8217; is a pretty good way to start. </p>
<p>I first read about Google and this about a year ago following that coding competition they run.</p>
<p>Some guy wrote a paper on &#8216;Link Stemming&#8217; and it talked about using LSI type stuff to filter out links that just don&#8217;t fit in with the site, and kinda stand out&#8230; [It was a little more detailed than that of course)</p>
<p>I lost the URL ages ago and I&#8217;ve been looking for it again fopr a while now, but it looks like the paper is buried somewhere and I can&#8217;t find it. </p>
<p>Hell, maybe Google sandboxed the site I read it on.</p>
<p>I doubt they&#8217;ll be penalising anyone for buying links, but they won&#8217;t have any value&#8230;</p>
<p>Links in copy &#8211; that&#8217;s where it&#8217;s at&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a389951l</title>
		<link>http://www.shoemoney.com/2005/12/14/google-is-on-the-offensive-with-paid-links/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>a389951l</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 03:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.shoemoney.com/?p=65#comment-629</guid>
		<description>Google would like to that this is true but I am with Mike on this one.  I would think this could be a manual damping factor.  Keyword anchor text can still rule the serps in the right situations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google would like to that this is true but I am with Mike on this one.  I would think this could be a manual damping factor.  Keyword anchor text can still rule the serps in the right situations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

